Diamondbacks Bullpen Forum Index Diamondbacks Bullpen
The baseball forum that doesn't suck
 
 Home       News Feed 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Pitching Staff: Regression to the mean will be harsh
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Diamondbacks Bullpen Forum Index -> Team News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
shoewizard
Face of the Franchise


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 8334
Location: In front of my computer

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:17 pm    Post subject: Pitching Staff: Regression to the mean will be harsh Reply with quote

Code:
Player    ERA    FIP    FIP-ERA  XFIP
Pena      2.67   4.08   1.40     4.03
Valverde  3.33   4.38   1.04     4.36
Hernandez 3.66   4.46   0.79     5.11
Davis     3.48   4.20   0.72     4.60
Lyon      2.51   3.22   0.71     4.71
Cruz      3.20   3.87   0.67     3.19
Slaten    2.87   3.47   0.60     3.63
Owings    3.76   4.07   0.31     4.45
Gonzalez  5.06   5.29   0.26     3.96
Webb      3.13   3.26   0.13     3.13
Johnson   3.52   2.61  -0.91     2.36


I predict the team ERA will rise sharply over the next month, perhaps by as much as half a run.

The bats better wake up QUICK

Link
_________________
"Whom the Gods wish to destroy, they first call promising"


Last edited by shoewizard on Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:31 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DBACKSHEELSPANTHS
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1494
Location: Virginia

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok....so why do you think it will go up like that? Just curious?
_________________
GO DBACKS!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shoewizard
Face of the Franchise


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 8334
Location: In front of my computer

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Fielding Independent Pitching, a measure of all those things for which a pitcher is specifically responsible. The formula is (HR*13+(BB+HBP)*3-K*2)/IP, plus a league-specific factor (usually around 3.2) to round out the number to an equivalent ERA number. FIP helps you understand how well a pitcher pitched, regardless of how well his fielders fielded. FIP was invented by


Quote:
Expected Fielding Independent Pitching. This is an experimental stat that adjusts FIP and "normalizes" the home run component. Research has shown that home runs allowed are pretty much a function of flyballs allowed and home park, so xFIP is based on the average number of home runs allowed per outfield fly. Theoretically, this should be a better predicter of a pitcher's future ERA.


When you see all the ERA's considerably lower than the FIP you would expect, based on the pitchers components, that is usually an indication there is a good amount of luck going on, especially with balls in play. Of course good defense can make a teams pitchers look better, and that is clealy the case here with this team, especially the OF defense.

But there are limits. Besides RJ, who should actually lower his ERA, and Webb, who has pitched right about to his current ERA, every other pitcher has an ERA that is lower than his FIP, and many by quite large margins.

"REPENT....FOR REGRESSION IS NIGH"


_________________
"Whom the Gods wish to destroy, they first call promising"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
levski
Hall of Famer


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 4071

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

shoewiz: the boy who cried xFIP
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shoewizard
Face of the Franchise


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 8334
Location: In front of my computer

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

levski wrote:
shoewiz: the boy who cried xFIP


LOL


BTW, do you disagree? Am I misreading the data?
_________________
"Whom the Gods wish to destroy, they first call promising"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moviegeekjn
Hall of Famer


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 2820
Location: Phoenix

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

levski wrote:
shoewiz: the boy who cried xFIP


... but if this turns out, he can claim that he was right Wink
_________________
Old School Reviews
Among the 6% of Az. fans who wouldn't have extended the "face of the franchise" for $30 million.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
levski
Hall of Famer


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 4071

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

moviegeekjn wrote:
levski wrote:
shoewiz: the boy who cried xFIP


... but if this turns out, he can claim that he was right Wink


...and if he's wrong, he'll cry "jason johnson"

Shoe, I wouldn't worry about xFIP to predict short term regression

FIP is nice, but there's plenty of reasons why the team ERA can remain lower than WHIP... and yes, luck is one of them
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shoewizard
Face of the Franchise


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 8334
Location: In front of my computer

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sure....like I said...the defense is the main reason that the team FIP is lower than it's ERA.

If I was going just by the numbers, I would be expecting MORE than half run regression. Keep in mind I said PERHAPS by as much as half a run. That would seem to be the upper limit. We have smart pitchers who know how to work out of a jam and a good defense, so ERA being better with FIP with this team is a predictable result.

But not by this much. It's too extreme. Whenever you see numbers THAT extreme, THAT out of whack, you almost always see some serious regression in the not too distant future.
_________________
"Whom the Gods wish to destroy, they first call promising"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dbackfanron
Journeyman


Joined: 28 Oct 2006
Posts: 384

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Next you're going to tell me there's no Santa Claus.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DBACKSHEELSPANTHS
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1494
Location: Virginia

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

shoewizard wrote:
levski wrote:
shoewiz: the boy who cried xFIP


LOL


BTW, do you disagree? Am I misreading the data?


No...i think we all agree. I was just curious why "you" thought this.
_________________
GO DBACKS!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dbackfanron
Journeyman


Joined: 28 Oct 2006
Posts: 384

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm more of a mode man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
qudjy1
Hall of Famer


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 4067

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sample size is an issue with the relievers.

Obviously, Davis and Livan will always be "regression candidates" here..

I think our era is going to be worse going to AL parks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dre
Everyday Player


Joined: 05 Jan 2007
Posts: 674
Location: Chicago

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Pitching Staff: Regression to the mean will be harsh Reply with quote

shoewizard wrote:
Code:
Player    ERA    FIP    FIP-ERA  XFIP
Pena      2.67   4.08   1.40     4.03
Valverde  3.33   4.38   1.04     4.36
Hernandez 3.66   4.46   0.79     5.11
Davis     3.48   4.20   0.72     4.60
Lyon      2.51   3.22   0.71     4.71
Cruz      3.20   3.87   0.67     3.19
Slaten    2.87   3.47   0.60     3.63
Owings    3.76   4.07   0.31     4.45
Gonzalez  5.06   5.29   0.26     3.96
Webb      3.13   3.26   0.13     3.13
Johnson   3.52   2.61  -0.91     2.36


I predict the team ERA will rise sharply over the next month, perhaps by as much as half a run.

The bats better wake up QUICK

Link


Team ERA is currently 3.64, are you saying that come the AS Break you think this # will raise up to 4.14? Or that over the next 26 games until the break that we could see a 4.14 ERA out of the staff? Meaning over the next 26 games, they'd need an ERA of approximately 5.35 to raise the season ERA to 4.14.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
shoewizard
Face of the Franchise


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 8334
Location: In front of my computer

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
are you saying that come the AS Break you think this # will raise up to 4.14?


oops..sorry...mis read your question.

I am saying I would expect the Team ERA to be OVER 4.50 for the next month, which would raise the team ERA at least .2 or .3 If they had a team ERA over 5 for the next month, than it would go up a full half run.
_________________
"Whom the Gods wish to destroy, they first call promising"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dre
Everyday Player


Joined: 05 Jan 2007
Posts: 674
Location: Chicago

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

shoewizard wrote:
Quote:
are you saying that come the AS Break you think this # will raise up to 4.14?


oops..sorry...mis read your question.

I am saying I would expect the Team ERA to be OVER 4.50 for the next month, which would raise the team ERA at least .2 or .3 If they had a team ERA over 5 for the next month, than it would go up a full half run.


K, I was a bit confused by your original thought process as you were by my question a bit as well.

I can see an ERA in the 4.25ish range but not 4.50 or even the 5.35 neighborhood that it would take to raise it a half a run.

Obviously we can't expect DD to keep his low ERA, but I expect Livan and Owings to be able to maintain their current marks without a huge variance. RJ and Webb should be able to easily maintain or even lower theirs.

The bullpen is anyone's guess and should be helped by the departure of Medders. Just looking at raw #s, no one's ERA seems excessively high/low in regards to their pitching ability.

Starters: 402.2 IP 3.51 ERA
Bullpen: 172.2 IP 3.96 ERA

Granted, I'm not up to snuff as much on FIP, xFIP, etc but I don't really see anything in the general #s or from watching the games that would lead me to believe our staff would blow up and see a long run of bad outings. Eh, who knows... I guess that's why they play the games.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Goose
Everyday Player


Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 858
Location: Aberdeen,Wa

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

qudjy1 wrote:
Sample size is an issue with the relievers.

Obviously, Davis and Livan will always be "regression candidates" here..

I think our era is going to be worse going to AL parks.


Yeah. ERA,FIP, and xFIP have always had less impact on relievers because of their nature. They pitch less innings, only face a part of the lineup once, and generally go max effort. So the chances of regression are much less. Not to mention that relievers tend to wildly fluctuate from year to year anyways.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
qudjy1
Hall of Famer


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 4067

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leave it to shoewizard to predict a pitching regression before the series in NYY... lol...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shoewizard
Face of the Franchise


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 8334
Location: In front of my computer

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Goose wrote:
qudjy1 wrote:
Sample size is an issue with the relievers.

Obviously, Davis and Livan will always be "regression candidates" here..

I think our era is going to be worse going to AL parks.


Yeah. ERA,FIP, and xFIP have always had less impact on relievers because of their nature. They pitch less innings, only face a part of the lineup once, and generally go max effort. So the chances of regression are much less. Not to mention that relievers tend to wildly fluctuate from year to year anyways.


Yeah....but ALL of them? Rolling Eyes
_________________
"Whom the Gods wish to destroy, they first call promising"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shoewizard
Face of the Franchise


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 8334
Location: In front of my computer

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

qudjy1 wrote:
Leave it to shoewizard to predict a pitching regression before the series in NYY... lol...


Funny......I wasn't even thinking about that until AFTER you mentioned it.
_________________
"Whom the Gods wish to destroy, they first call promising"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
qudjy1
Hall of Famer


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 4067

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

shoewizard wrote:
Funny......I wasn't even thinking about that until AFTER you mentioned it.


Riiiiiigggghhhhttttt.... Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TAP
Face of the Franchise


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 6388

PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nick Piecoro's prognosis: Good for Brandon and Randy, Bad for Livan and Doug, Unknown for Micah
_________________
"A baseball game is simply a nervous breakdown divided into nine innings."
- Earl Wilson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
levski
Hall of Famer


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 4071

PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TAP wrote:
Nick Piecoro's prognosis: Good for Brandon and Randy, Bad for Livan and Doug, Unknown for Micah


Has anyone seen Nick and Shoewizard in the same room at the same time?
_________________
Shoewizard is my Daddy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TAP
Face of the Franchise


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 6388

PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

levski wrote:
TAP wrote:
Nick Piecoro's prognosis: Good for Brandon and Randy, Bad for Livan and Doug, Unknown for Micah

Has anyone seen Nick and Shoewizard in the same room at the same time?

I have. Laughing
_________________
"A baseball game is simply a nervous breakdown divided into nine innings."
- Earl Wilson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shoewizard
Face of the Franchise


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 8334
Location: In front of my computer

PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I love it when Nick educates the masses like that. Good stuff.
_________________
"Whom the Gods wish to destroy, they first call promising"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moviegeekjn
Hall of Famer


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 2820
Location: Phoenix

PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TAP wrote:

I have. Laughing


Were they collaborating on "Nick"'s next blog? Wink
_________________
Old School Reviews
Among the 6% of Az. fans who wouldn't have extended the "face of the franchise" for $30 million.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Diamondbacks Bullpen Forum Index -> Team News All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



visitors since April 13, 2006.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group