View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tmar
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1124
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hopefully the FO is a little more aware of bomels "weakness" and guides his move a bit more in 07.
Hopefully they're looking to showcase Hairston this year and then possibly use him as a trade to an AL club or so as a DH.
Lastly, as for Hairston's 2004 season, he was also on line to hit over 20 HR if given 550AB's. Not bad for a rookie season. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
foulpole
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1302
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TAP wrote: |
Now that you mention his name, PCL Player of the Year Andy Green was never given a chance at the major league level either as BoMel preferred his trusted .236 hitting ProvenVeteran™ Damon Easley. Wasted talent relegated to Japan for lack of opportunity. |
Ya, and the other 29 teams all missed that this guy was the second coming...
get used to wash outs because it happens.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1618
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
foulpole wrote: |
TAP wrote: |
Now that you mention his name, PCL Player of the Year Andy Green was never given a chance at the major league level either as BoMel preferred his trusted .236 hitting ProvenVeteran™ Damon Easley. Wasted talent relegated to Japan for lack of opportunity. |
Ya, and the other 29 teams all missed that this guy was the second coming...
get used to wash outs because it happens.
|
there is unwritten understanding among baseball executives that when a player is put on waivers so that he can go to Japan, the other teams do not claim him but rather let him leave for Japan. that's always been done this way, except once, when the Red Sox claimed Kevin Millar...
i'm not going to turn this into an andy green defense diatribe, nor am i going to point out why your anti-hairston arguments are about as muddled as dubya's claims that he's winning the wars he started. i'll just say that your dim-witted logic couldn't convince a nympho to date brad pitt...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
csktech
September Call-Up
Joined: 25 Jan 2007
Posts: 94
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
levski wrote: |
foulpole wrote: |
TAP wrote: |
Now that you mention his name, PCL Player of the Year Andy Green was never given a chance at the major league level either as BoMel preferred his trusted .236 hitting ProvenVeteran™ Damon Easley. Wasted talent relegated to Japan for lack of opportunity. |
Ya, and the other 29 teams all missed that this guy was the second coming...
get used to wash outs because it happens.
|
there is unwritten understanding among baseball executives that when a player is put on waivers so that he can go to Japan, the other teams do not claim him but rather let him leave for Japan. that's always been done this way, except once, when the Red Sox claimed Kevin Millar...
i'm not going to turn this into an andy green defense diatribe, nor am i going to point out why your anti-hairston arguments are about as muddled as dubya's claims that he's winning the wars he started. i'll just say that your dim-witted logic couldn't convince a nympho to date brad pitt...
|
Im gonna chime in with Lev. I liked Andy Green, but he's a AAAA player. He might be picked up somewhere along the lines, but more as a cheap back-up than anything else.
It's a sad reality but, sometimes dreams do die along the way.
Kyle
_________________
Ware the Dragon, for thou art crunchy and good with ketchup
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
stu
Everyday Player
Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 536
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here is Rob Neyer's expnaltion of the Millar and Japan and waiver scenario:
Aside from Pudge Rodriguez, right now the best "available" hitter might be Kevin Millar, late of the Florida Marlins.
We put "available" in quotes because it's been reported that Millar's contract has actually been sold to Japan's Chunichi Dragons, which of course would make Millar something less than "available" to the other 29 major-league clubs.
However, nothing's official yet. With a player's permission, a major-league team can sell his contract to a team in Japan. Typically, the MLB franchise will receive a significant sum -- in this case, perhaps $2 million -- and the player will negotiate a new deal with the Japanese team.
There's a technicality, though: as a part of the process, Millar must pass through waivers, at which point another major-league team has every right to claim him. There is a gentlemen's agreement among GM's to not claim such players, but of course gentlemen's agreements are made to be broken.
So what happens if somebody -- the Braves, let's say -- claims Millar? Probably nothing. Claiming Millar would give Braves GM John Schuerholz only the right to negotiate with Millar, who is still free to head off for Japan if he chooses.
As of early Friday afternoon, the Marlins still hadn't put Millar on waivers. So for the moment, this is all academic.
Green had a wonderful year at Tucson, but he was never a prospect. Hairston is and has always been recognized as a major league caliber hitter. Don't get too caught up on minor league stats. They have value, but can't always be taken at face. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1618
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Green had a wonderful year at Tucson, but he was never a prospect. |
Eric Byrnes was never a prospect either.
Quote: |
Hairston is and has always been recognized as a major league caliber hitter. |
that's the distinction that a certain genius fails to recognize
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
stu
Everyday Player
Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 536
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Eric Byrnes was never a prospect either.
Lev, you are becoming the Swift of the board for satire. I can't figure out if this is satire or not. It broke my sarcasm meter even at the UNC Steve setting.
However, it tweaked my memory or lack thereof. I think I remember Byrnes in several ST games for the A's before he came up full time and thinking that he had a chance to be a regular outfielder for them I am sur ehe was fighting for ajob a number of those years and I want to say he was in the 23-24 range when that started. Can anyone educate me here?
In any event, Bynres made a major league appearence when he was 24 and was a regular by 26. Green will be 30 this July and we know what he has done and the chances (or lack thereof) that he was given. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TAP
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 2238
Location: Gold Canyon
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
levski wrote: |
I certainly hope you're on the short list to replace Sabean after this year... |
...and unless Sabean has something really juicy on McGowan, Peter should be filling Brian's open slot soon.
Matt Hurst of The Press-Enterprise today wrote: |
By the time they left for spring training in 2003, 12 players from the World Series team were gone. By the end of the 2003 season, another four were gone, meaning that in just one year from the time the Giants were this close to winning it all, they had parted ways with 16 players, or 64 percent of the team.
The Giants haven't exactly gotten younger...
Heading into this season, San Francisco is the eighth-oldest team in the majors and its farm system was ranked 27th by ESPN.com's Keith Law, a former Toronto Blue Jays executive. Law wrote: "The Giants have willfully surrendered their first-round picks for years," which means they have been happy to trade for more established players or sign older players who are free agents.
The trend continued this winter as the Giants even re-signed two players from the 2002 team, Rich Aurilia and Russ Ortiz. Each is well past his prime.
What do they have to show for their efforts since 2002? An NL West crown in 2003 and no playoff appearances since. |
link
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pilgrim 33
Draft Pick
Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 8
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As for Eric Byrnes not being a prospect, he was the all-time hits leader, runs scored leader, and doubles leader for UCLA while posting a .331 career average. He also tied the PAC-10 doubles record and was twice First-Team All Pac-10. He helped lead UCLA to the College World Series and was drafted in the 8th round by Oakland in 1998 after bypassing a 4th round selection by Houston the previous year. He posted solid average and stolen base numbers coming up through the A's system and had a very good 2001 in Triple-A Sacramento with 20 homeruns, 25 stolen bases, and a .289 average. I remember reading about him in fantasy baseball reports at the time as one to keep an eye on, but think he lost a good portion of 2002 to a viral infection if I remember correctly. While he may not be considered a can't miss prospect, I would say he was fairly high-profile given his collegiate pedigree. At 6'2", 210 pounds I think he certainly projected as more of a major league type by scouts than 5'9", 180 pound Andy Green (who looks to be closer to 165-170 pounds). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1618
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Lev, you are becoming the Swift of the board for satire. I can't figure out if this is satire or not. It broke my sarcasm meter even at the UNC Steve setting.
|
Ah, Stu, you had me at "Hello"...
Quote: |
However, it tweaked my memory or lack thereof. I think I remember Byrnes in several ST games for the A's before he came up full time and thinking that he had a chance to be a regular outfielder for them I am sur ehe was fighting for ajob a number of those years and I want to say he was in the 23-24 range when that started. Can anyone educate me here? |
Eric Byrnes was never a top prospect in my book, or in Baseball America's book either. If you look at BA's all-time Top 100 lists,
http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/features/26983.html
Eric Byrnes shows up only once, when he was ranked 91st in 2002.
On the other hand, Hairston was a much more regarded prospect, in both 2003 and 2004. He was 26th on the list in 2003, and 34th on the list in 2004 (these rankings were done going into the respective seasons).
Eric Byrnes has always been too old for the leagues he played in, and being a polished college hitter from a competitive conference, he really had no problems dominating the minor leagues, as one would expect.
He was 25 for his first full season in AAA, and his season there was nothing spectacular, once you account for his age and hitting environment. In fact, he was a AAAA player in both 2001 and 2002, until the A's finally broke him in as a part-time player in 2003...
http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/B/Eric-Byrnes.shtml
In 5 minor league seasons, he has a career .874 OPS, and he was consistently old for his league.
Scott Hairston has had the much better minor league career (.972 OPS) and was a better prospect coming up. Granted, he received a boost in BA's rankings because he was a 2nd baseman, but he nonetheless was viewed as a much better hitter than Eric Byrnes was...
http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/H/Scott-Hairston.shtml
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1618
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Granted, Andy Green was never a prospect either. That's usually the case when you are drafted as a senior, and the organization views you as nothing more than organizational filler... until you have your career year at age 27.
In fact, the front office screwed up big time (and screwed up Andy Green big time too) by failing to either trade him OR sell him to Japan last year, after his breakout season in AAA. I'm sure the Dbacks would've gotten a lot more than $280K from a Japanese team, and Andy would've gotten a bigger contract, if the Dbacks hadn't jerked him around in 2006... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stu
Everyday Player
Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 536
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, Pilgrim. (Felt like John Wayne there). I'm glad my memory wasn't too bad.
Lev, I thought we were comparing Byrnes to Green. I agree Hairston has always been considered a better prospect than Byrnes, but for a player to even crack the 100 is pretty good. My guess is that Green never sniffed BA's top 100.
There are certainly good major leaguers who were not on BA's top 100 list, but I thought we were discussing how much patience you have with these players and what you expect from them.
I agree that Green could have been handled better, but you can say the same for Hairston and a number of others. As long as Melvin is given his druthers, I don't think we should expect to see young players handled properly unless they are clearly stars and he is forced to play them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dangerfield
Everyday Player
Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 627
Location: worm factory
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
we probably would of won the division last year if Andy would of been our left fielder, in Aug.
_________________
My wife is always trying to get rid of me. The other day she told me to put the garbage out. I said to her I already did. She told me to go and keep an eye on it |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stu
Everyday Player
Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 536
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Did you see who was ranked number 91 the year before Byrnes?
91. Miguel Cabrera, ss, Marlins |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stu
Everyday Player
Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 536
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
we probably would of won the division last year if Andy would of been our left fielder, in Aug.
Not to pick, but good teams (and organizations generally) sweat the small stuff. The odds are that what the Dbacks did with Green is not going to make a big difference, but maybe if he got some more PT, he would have fetched the 91st prospect on some prospect list. Maybe they get an extra 500k from Japan and they use that to bump up a bid for a Drew type draft choice. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1618
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stu wrote: |
Did you see who was ranked number 91 the year before Byrnes?
91. Miguel Cabrera, ss, Marlins |
How old was Cabrera in 2001 and how old was Byrnes in 2002?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
stu
Everyday Player
Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 536
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Still both 91. This is BA's ranking the presumably takes age into account. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1618
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stu wrote: |
Still both 91. This is BA's ranking the presumably takes age into account. |
Not really. Projecting a guy who's 23 is a lot easier than projecting a guy who's 18... It takes a lot more guts to put an 18 year old at 91 than it does to put a 23 year old there...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
foulpole
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1302
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
levski wrote: |
there is unwritten understanding among baseball executives that when a player is put on waivers so that he can go to Japan, the other teams do not claim him but rather let him leave for Japan.
...nor am i going to point out why your anti-hairston arguments are about as muddled as dubya's claims that he's winning the wars he started. i'll just say that your dim-witted logic... |
I have to assume that J Byrnes and co. shopped A. Green before the trip to Japan came up. As far as "anti-hairston" argument I simply wrote that he has to produce and did say that he did look better at the plate in '06 then previous years. He's reaching his peak performance age and is not all that young anymore. If JB and co felt that strongly that Hairston is indeed the answer in LF then why re-sign E Byrnes and pimp him up as the '07 LF?
BTW, I really don't feel that any of my posts deserve a personal attack.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1618
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
foulpole wrote: |
levski wrote: |
there is unwritten understanding among baseball executives that when a player is put on waivers so that he can go to Japan, the other teams do not claim him but rather let him leave for Japan.
...nor am i going to point out why your anti-hairston arguments are about as muddled as dubya's claims that he's winning the wars he started. i'll just say that your dim-witted logic... |
I have to assume that J Byrnes and co. shopped A. Green before the trip to Japan came up. As far as "anti-hairston" argument I simply wrote that he has to produce and did say that he did look better at the plate in '06 then previous years. He's reaching his peak performance age and is not all that young anymore. If JB and co felt that strongly that Hairston is indeed the answer in LF then why re-sign E Byrnes and pimp him up as the '07 LF?
BTW, I really don't feel that any of my posts deserve a personal attack.
|
Well, I questioned your logic, not your persona. Big difference. There is hope for your logic...
Anyhow, I really didn't mean to make my posts personal. The last thing I really want is a flame war...
At the risk of sounding (again) like an Andy Green homeboy, let me just say that there was plenty of interest in him after his 2005 season in AAA, both from mlb teams and from Japan. For one reason or another, the Dbacks did not trade him before 2006. And this past season, BoMel's handling of Green ensured that his trade value would be non-existent.
As far as why re-sign Byrnes is you feel that Hairston is ready, some reasons that come to mind...
1) there wasn't much trade market for Byrnes in the offseason, but Byrnes believes it will open up mid-season
2) Byrnes is nice insurance in LF if Hairston struggles or gets hurt
3) Byrnes is nice 4th OFer until DaVanon is healthy
4) Byrnes can play CF in a pinch until Young is hitting on all cylinders
5) Byrnes is someone that all the homers still in love with Gonzo can fondle in their sleep
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
EvilJuan
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1746
Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
levski wrote: |
5) Byrnes is someone that all the homers still in love with Gonzo can fondle in their sleep |
Listen to the man. He knows what he's talkin' about.
The first four reasons also count...
_________________
Is It Next Season Yet?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tmar
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1124
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My prediction is that Byrnes is so butt-hurt he didn't get a multi-year deal that he gets traded before the trade deadline just to get him out of town. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
XB3
Journeyman
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 341
Location: Free Scott Hairston!
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
tmar wrote: |
My prediction is that Byrnes is so butt-hurt he didn't get a multi-year deal that he gets traded before the trade deadline just to get him out of town. |
Then he can take a whimsical look at what its' like to get traded in the big leagues.
Cross thread humor attempt
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
EvilJuan
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1746
Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
XB3 wrote: |
tmar wrote: |
My prediction is that Byrnes is so butt-hurt he didn't get a multi-year deal that he gets traded before the trade deadline just to get him out of town. |
Then he can take a whimsical look at what its' like to get traded in the big leagues.
Cross thread humor attempt
|
Foxy comment, XB3!
_________________
Is It Next Season Yet?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
foulpole
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1302
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
levski wrote: |
At the risk of sounding (again) like an Andy Green homeboy, let me just say that there was plenty of interest in him after his 2005 season in AAA, both from mlb teams and from Japan. For one reason or another, the Dbacks did not trade him before 2006. And this past season, BoMel's handling of Green ensured that his trade value would be non-existent.
2) Byrnes is nice insurance in LF if Hairston struggles or gets hurt
3) Byrnes is nice 4th OFer until DaVanon is healthy
4) Byrnes can play CF in a pinch until Young is hitting on all cylinders
|
I think that the acquisition, performance and age of Callaspo ( and green's age ) had more to do with A. Green's ultimate departure than anything else. Not a bad idea to keep Green until the org was more confident that Callaspo would step up. BTW, if the AL dropped the DH then maybe there would be 14 other teams that may have a spot for a utility guy?
It also sounds like you may have some concerns about fielding such an inexperienced OF without some form of insurance, no? If so, I think that is a legitimate concern.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|