Diamondbacks Bullpen Forum Index Diamondbacks Bullpen
The baseball forum that doesn't suck
 
 Home       News Feed 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
projected line-up
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Diamondbacks Bullpen Forum Index -> Team News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tmar
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1186

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hopefully the FO is a little more aware of bomels "weakness" and guides his move a bit more in 07.

Hopefully they're looking to showcase Hairston this year and then possibly use him as a trade to an AL club or so as a DH.

Lastly, as for Hairston's 2004 season, he was also on line to hit over 20 HR if given 550AB's. Not bad for a rookie season.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
foulpole
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1358

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TAP wrote:
Now that you mention his name, PCL Player of the Year Andy Green was never given a chance at the major league level either as BoMel preferred his trusted .236 hitting ProvenVeteran™ Damon Easley. Wasted talent relegated to Japan for lack of opportunity.


Ya, and the other 29 teams all missed that this guy was the second coming...
Rolling Eyes
get used to wash outs because it happens.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
levski
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1766

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 8:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

foulpole wrote:
TAP wrote:
Now that you mention his name, PCL Player of the Year Andy Green was never given a chance at the major league level either as BoMel preferred his trusted .236 hitting ProvenVeteran™ Damon Easley. Wasted talent relegated to Japan for lack of opportunity.


Ya, and the other 29 teams all missed that this guy was the second coming...
Rolling Eyes
get used to wash outs because it happens.


there is unwritten understanding among baseball executives that when a player is put on waivers so that he can go to Japan, the other teams do not claim him but rather let him leave for Japan. that's always been done this way, except once, when the Red Sox claimed Kevin Millar...

i'm not going to turn this into an andy green defense diatribe, nor am i going to point out why your anti-hairston arguments are about as muddled as dubya's claims that he's winning the wars he started. i'll just say that your dim-witted logic couldn't convince a nympho to date brad pitt...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
csktech
MLB Rookie


Joined: 25 Jan 2007
Posts: 104

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

levski wrote:
foulpole wrote:
TAP wrote:
Now that you mention his name, PCL Player of the Year Andy Green was never given a chance at the major league level either as BoMel preferred his trusted .236 hitting ProvenVeteran™ Damon Easley. Wasted talent relegated to Japan for lack of opportunity.


Ya, and the other 29 teams all missed that this guy was the second coming...
Rolling Eyes
get used to wash outs because it happens.


there is unwritten understanding among baseball executives that when a player is put on waivers so that he can go to Japan, the other teams do not claim him but rather let him leave for Japan. that's always been done this way, except once, when the Red Sox claimed Kevin Millar...

i'm not going to turn this into an andy green defense diatribe, nor am i going to point out why your anti-hairston arguments are about as muddled as dubya's claims that he's winning the wars he started. i'll just say that your dim-witted logic couldn't convince a nympho to date brad pitt...


Im gonna chime in with Lev. I liked Andy Green, but he's a AAAA player. He might be picked up somewhere along the lines, but more as a cheap back-up than anything else.

It's a sad reality but, sometimes dreams do die along the way.

Kyle
_________________
Ware the Dragon, for thou art crunchy and good with ketchup
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stu
Everyday Player


Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 560

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is Rob Neyer's expnaltion of the Millar and Japan and waiver scenario:

Aside from Pudge Rodriguez, right now the best "available" hitter might be Kevin Millar, late of the Florida Marlins.


We put "available" in quotes because it's been reported that Millar's contract has actually been sold to Japan's Chunichi Dragons, which of course would make Millar something less than "available" to the other 29 major-league clubs.


However, nothing's official yet. With a player's permission, a major-league team can sell his contract to a team in Japan. Typically, the MLB franchise will receive a significant sum -- in this case, perhaps $2 million -- and the player will negotiate a new deal with the Japanese team.


There's a technicality, though: as a part of the process, Millar must pass through waivers, at which point another major-league team has every right to claim him. There is a gentlemen's agreement among GM's to not claim such players, but of course gentlemen's agreements are made to be broken.


So what happens if somebody -- the Braves, let's say -- claims Millar? Probably nothing. Claiming Millar would give Braves GM John Schuerholz only the right to negotiate with Millar, who is still free to head off for Japan if he chooses.


As of early Friday afternoon, the Marlins still hadn't put Millar on waivers. So for the moment, this is all academic.


Green had a wonderful year at Tucson, but he was never a prospect. Hairston is and has always been recognized as a major league caliber hitter. Don't get too caught up on minor league stats. They have value, but can't always be taken at face.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
levski
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1766

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Green had a wonderful year at Tucson, but he was never a prospect.


Eric Byrnes was never a prospect either.

Quote:
Hairston is and has always been recognized as a major league caliber hitter.


that's the distinction that a certain genius fails to recognize
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stu
Everyday Player


Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 560

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eric Byrnes was never a prospect either.

Lev, you are becoming the Swift of the board for satire. I can't figure out if this is satire or not. It broke my sarcasm meter even at the UNC Steve setting.

However, it tweaked my memory or lack thereof. I think I remember Byrnes in several ST games for the A's before he came up full time and thinking that he had a chance to be a regular outfielder for them I am sur ehe was fighting for ajob a number of those years and I want to say he was in the 23-24 range when that started. Can anyone educate me here?

In any event, Bynres made a major league appearence when he was 24 and was a regular by 26. Green will be 30 this July and we know what he has done and the chances (or lack thereof) that he was given.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TAP
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 2404
Location: Gold Canyon

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 11:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

levski wrote:
I certainly hope you're on the short list to replace Sabean after this year...

...and unless Sabean has something really juicy on McGowan, Peter should be filling Brian's open slot soon. Shocked

Matt Hurst of The Press-Enterprise today wrote:
By the time they left for spring training in 2003, 12 players from the World Series team were gone. By the end of the 2003 season, another four were gone, meaning that in just one year from the time the Giants were this close to winning it all, they had parted ways with 16 players, or 64 percent of the team.

The Giants haven't exactly gotten younger...

Heading into this season, San Francisco is the eighth-oldest team in the majors and its farm system was ranked 27th by ESPN.com's Keith Law, a former Toronto Blue Jays executive. Law wrote: "The Giants have willfully surrendered their first-round picks for years," which means they have been happy to trade for more established players or sign older players who are free agents.

The trend continued this winter as the Giants even re-signed two players from the 2002 team, Rich Aurilia and Russ Ortiz. Each is well past his prime.

What do they have to show for their efforts since 2002? An NL West crown in 2003 and no playoff appearances since.

link
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pilgrim 33
Draft Pick


Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As for Eric Byrnes not being a prospect, he was the all-time hits leader, runs scored leader, and doubles leader for UCLA while posting a .331 career average. He also tied the PAC-10 doubles record and was twice First-Team All Pac-10. He helped lead UCLA to the College World Series and was drafted in the 8th round by Oakland in 1998 after bypassing a 4th round selection by Houston the previous year. He posted solid average and stolen base numbers coming up through the A's system and had a very good 2001 in Triple-A Sacramento with 20 homeruns, 25 stolen bases, and a .289 average. I remember reading about him in fantasy baseball reports at the time as one to keep an eye on, but think he lost a good portion of 2002 to a viral infection if I remember correctly. While he may not be considered a can't miss prospect, I would say he was fairly high-profile given his collegiate pedigree. At 6'2", 210 pounds I think he certainly projected as more of a major league type by scouts than 5'9", 180 pound Andy Green (who looks to be closer to 165-170 pounds).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
levski
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1766

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Lev, you are becoming the Swift of the board for satire. I can't figure out if this is satire or not. It broke my sarcasm meter even at the UNC Steve setting.


Ah, Stu, you had me at "Hello"...


Quote:

However, it tweaked my memory or lack thereof. I think I remember Byrnes in several ST games for the A's before he came up full time and thinking that he had a chance to be a regular outfielder for them I am sur ehe was fighting for ajob a number of those years and I want to say he was in the 23-24 range when that started. Can anyone educate me here?



Eric Byrnes was never a top prospect in my book, or in Baseball America's book either. If you look at BA's all-time Top 100 lists,

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/features/26983.html

Eric Byrnes shows up only once, when he was ranked 91st in 2002.

On the other hand, Hairston was a much more regarded prospect, in both 2003 and 2004. He was 26th on the list in 2003, and 34th on the list in 2004 (these rankings were done going into the respective seasons).

Eric Byrnes has always been too old for the leagues he played in, and being a polished college hitter from a competitive conference, he really had no problems dominating the minor leagues, as one would expect.

He was 25 for his first full season in AAA, and his season there was nothing spectacular, once you account for his age and hitting environment. In fact, he was a AAAA player in both 2001 and 2002, until the A's finally broke him in as a part-time player in 2003...

http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/B/Eric-Byrnes.shtml

In 5 minor league seasons, he has a career .874 OPS, and he was consistently old for his league.

Scott Hairston has had the much better minor league career (.972 OPS) and was a better prospect coming up. Granted, he received a boost in BA's rankings because he was a 2nd baseman, but he nonetheless was viewed as a much better hitter than Eric Byrnes was...

http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/H/Scott-Hairston.shtml
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
levski
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1766

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Granted, Andy Green was never a prospect either. That's usually the case when you are drafted as a senior, and the organization views you as nothing more than organizational filler... until you have your career year at age 27.

In fact, the front office screwed up big time (and screwed up Andy Green big time too) by failing to either trade him OR sell him to Japan last year, after his breakout season in AAA. I'm sure the Dbacks would've gotten a lot more than $280K from a Japanese team, and Andy would've gotten a bigger contract, if the Dbacks hadn't jerked him around in 2006...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stu
Everyday Player


Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 560

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks, Pilgrim. (Felt like John Wayne there). I'm glad my memory wasn't too bad.

Lev, I thought we were comparing Byrnes to Green. I agree Hairston has always been considered a better prospect than Byrnes, but for a player to even crack the 100 is pretty good. My guess is that Green never sniffed BA's top 100.

There are certainly good major leaguers who were not on BA's top 100 list, but I thought we were discussing how much patience you have with these players and what you expect from them.

I agree that Green could have been handled better, but you can say the same for Hairston and a number of others. As long as Melvin is given his druthers, I don't think we should expect to see young players handled properly unless they are clearly stars and he is forced to play them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dangerfield
Everyday Player


Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 666
Location: worm factory

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

we probably would of won the division last year if Andy would of been our left fielder, in Aug.
_________________
My wife is always trying to get rid of me. The other day she told me to put the garbage out. I said to her I already did. She told me to go and keep an eye on it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stu
Everyday Player


Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 560

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Did you see who was ranked number 91 the year before Byrnes?

91. Miguel Cabrera, ss, Marlins
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stu
Everyday Player


Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 560

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

we probably would of won the division last year if Andy would of been our left fielder, in Aug.

Not to pick, but good teams (and organizations generally) sweat the small stuff. The odds are that what the Dbacks did with Green is not going to make a big difference, but maybe if he got some more PT, he would have fetched the 91st prospect on some prospect list. Maybe they get an extra 500k from Japan and they use that to bump up a bid for a Drew type draft choice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
levski
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1766

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stu wrote:
Did you see who was ranked number 91 the year before Byrnes?

91. Miguel Cabrera, ss, Marlins


How old was Cabrera in 2001 and how old was Byrnes in 2002?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stu
Everyday Player


Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 560

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Still both 91. This is BA's ranking the presumably takes age into account.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
levski
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1766

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stu wrote:
Still both 91. This is BA's ranking the presumably takes age into account.


Not really. Projecting a guy who's 23 is a lot easier than projecting a guy who's 18... It takes a lot more guts to put an 18 year old at 91 than it does to put a 23 year old there...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
foulpole
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1358

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

levski wrote:
there is unwritten understanding among baseball executives that when a player is put on waivers so that he can go to Japan, the other teams do not claim him but rather let him leave for Japan.
...nor am i going to point out why your anti-hairston arguments are about as muddled as dubya's claims that he's winning the wars he started. i'll just say that your dim-witted logic...


I have to assume that J Byrnes and co. shopped A. Green before the trip to Japan came up. As far as "anti-hairston" argument I simply wrote that he has to produce and did say that he did look better at the plate in '06 then previous years. He's reaching his peak performance age and is not all that young anymore. If JB and co felt that strongly that Hairston is indeed the answer in LF then why re-sign E Byrnes and pimp him up as the '07 LF?

BTW, I really don't feel that any of my posts deserve a personal attack.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
levski
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1766

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

foulpole wrote:
levski wrote:
there is unwritten understanding among baseball executives that when a player is put on waivers so that he can go to Japan, the other teams do not claim him but rather let him leave for Japan.
...nor am i going to point out why your anti-hairston arguments are about as muddled as dubya's claims that he's winning the wars he started. i'll just say that your dim-witted logic...


I have to assume that J Byrnes and co. shopped A. Green before the trip to Japan came up. As far as "anti-hairston" argument I simply wrote that he has to produce and did say that he did look better at the plate in '06 then previous years. He's reaching his peak performance age and is not all that young anymore. If JB and co felt that strongly that Hairston is indeed the answer in LF then why re-sign E Byrnes and pimp him up as the '07 LF?

BTW, I really don't feel that any of my posts deserve a personal attack.



Well, I questioned your logic, not your persona. Big difference. There is hope for your logic...

Anyhow, I really didn't mean to make my posts personal. The last thing I really want is a flame war...

At the risk of sounding (again) like an Andy Green homeboy, let me just say that there was plenty of interest in him after his 2005 season in AAA, both from mlb teams and from Japan. For one reason or another, the Dbacks did not trade him before 2006. And this past season, BoMel's handling of Green ensured that his trade value would be non-existent.

As far as why re-sign Byrnes is you feel that Hairston is ready, some reasons that come to mind...

1) there wasn't much trade market for Byrnes in the offseason, but Byrnes believes it will open up mid-season

2) Byrnes is nice insurance in LF if Hairston struggles or gets hurt

3) Byrnes is nice 4th OFer until DaVanon is healthy

4) Byrnes can play CF in a pinch until Young is hitting on all cylinders

5) Byrnes is someone that all the homers still in love with Gonzo can fondle in their sleep
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EvilJuan
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1877
Location: Phoenix, AZ

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

levski wrote:
5) Byrnes is someone that all the homers still in love with Gonzo can fondle in their sleep


Arrow Listen to the man. He knows what he's talkin' about.

The first four reasons also count...
_________________
Is It Next Season Yet? Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tmar
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1186

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My prediction is that Byrnes is so butt-hurt he didn't get a multi-year deal that he gets traded before the trade deadline just to get him out of town.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
XB3
Journeyman


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 371
Location: The player named later

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

tmar wrote:
My prediction is that Byrnes is so butt-hurt he didn't get a multi-year deal that he gets traded before the trade deadline just to get him out of town.

Then he can take a whimsical look at what its' like to get traded in the big leagues. Cool
Cross thread humor attempt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EvilJuan
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1877
Location: Phoenix, AZ

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

XB3 wrote:
tmar wrote:
My prediction is that Byrnes is so butt-hurt he didn't get a multi-year deal that he gets traded before the trade deadline just to get him out of town.

Then he can take a whimsical look at what its' like to get traded in the big leagues. Cool
Cross thread humor attempt


Foxy comment, XB3!
Mr. Green
_________________
Is It Next Season Yet? Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
foulpole
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1358

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

levski wrote:

At the risk of sounding (again) like an Andy Green homeboy, let me just say that there was plenty of interest in him after his 2005 season in AAA, both from mlb teams and from Japan. For one reason or another, the Dbacks did not trade him before 2006. And this past season, BoMel's handling of Green ensured that his trade value would be non-existent.

2) Byrnes is nice insurance in LF if Hairston struggles or gets hurt

3) Byrnes is nice 4th OFer until DaVanon is healthy

4) Byrnes can play CF in a pinch until Young is hitting on all cylinders



I think that the acquisition, performance and age of Callaspo ( and green's age ) had more to do with A. Green's ultimate departure than anything else. Not a bad idea to keep Green until the org was more confident that Callaspo would step up. BTW, if the AL dropped the DH then maybe there would be 14 other teams that may have a spot for a utility guy?

It also sounds like you may have some concerns about fielding such an inexperienced OF without some form of insurance, no? If so, I think that is a legitimate concern.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Diamondbacks Bullpen Forum Index -> Team News All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



visitors since April 13, 2006.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group