Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1555
Location: clawing my eyes out, praying for sleep. booyah.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:26 am Post subject:
all the talk about tracy got me thinking. i was looking at his fangraphs, and it seems, though i could be wrong, that he might actually be getting better. we've been hypothosizing on here that perhaps tracy is trying for more power, and that's been hurting him, so i looked at his slg % for the year, and noticed it significantly dropped off around midseason, or slightly before.
his bb% shot up around that time (though it is regressing more again now), and i began to wonder if he stopped hitting for power, and perhaps stopped swinging at bad pitches -- the ones he was K'ing on big time.
sure enough, a little before midseason his K% dropped off at a pretty steady rate for a long time, from almost 30% of his PAs to a little over 15%. and his bb/k ratio elevated considerably for a while around midseason, though it's starting to tank again.
ld% stays relatively the same all season, but his fb% drops for a while after the same almost mid season point, while his gb% rises.
was tracy trying to control the strike zone more, during that time, and trying to hit the ball on the ground more? has he been getting a little better, or at least less bad?
it must be noted that virtually all these upticks in his trends seem to have ended; that is, he's starting to tank again. but i'm wondering if that was perhaps a significant effort on his part to "put the ball in play" and "hit them on the ground" and "stop swinging at horseshit pitches", as we've all been screaming at our tvs for him to do.
note: this is my first time trying to really analyze fan graphs as anything more than fun -- am i close to the mark, or am i reading too much into random noise? that the trend appears in so many varied aspects of his offensive game (which pitches to hit, which to lay off, where to hit them, to hit for power or not) makes me think it's more than noise, but i honestly don't know.
and it's 1:30 in the damn morning.
_________________
Hank, you're dead to me.
Just from my observation, I believe Tracy has developed two bad habits at the plate.
First, his body movement on the pitch developed into one which should allow him to pull the ball, in my view an attempt to provide more power. By throwing his butt out and turning early in this way, he's left himself highly vulnerable to pitches away. He must lunge somewhat at them and can only put an arm-swing on them, resulting in weakly hit balls to the left side and even up the middle. The only pitches he puts a "power" swing on are inside corner pitches and he just doesn't see many of them anymore.
Second, Tracy seems to have no conception of what pitchers are trying to do to him. He most often takes first pitch fastballs, often right down the middle, and then finds himself behind in the count. Then he begins swinging at pitches out of the strike zone and since most often those are away pitches, he cannot get any kind of power swing on them at all, given his body movement. So he's somewhat stuck with flailing at away pitches instead of being able to hit them with force.
Finally, he's become a real sucker for sharply breaking pitches low and inside, again (IMO) in an attempt to provide power. He just can't seem to even recognize them for what they are anymore and he certainly can't lay off them, especially when behind in the count.
With a few exceptions, I think the vast majority of Tracy's basehits these last 3-4 months have been of the bloop type, dribblers through the infield, little pop flies which elude defenders, with the occasional harder slice hit to LF and the rare line drive shot somewhere. Not many balls hit fair down the RF line or in the RF/CF gap.
Tracy needs to decide what kind of hitter he wants to be and then adjust his plate approach to accomodate it. If he wants to be a pull hitter, he ought to adopt the Darrell Porter stance close to the plate and dare the pitcher to throw it inside. That way he might at least cover the outside part of the plate better. If he wants to be more of a contact hitter, he needs to step into the ball instead of trying to twist away from it and still make solid contact.
IMO, Tracy needs a lot of close personal instruction and hitting/swinging repetitions in the off season to correct these faults, plus some serious teaching in recognition of the strike zone and in a method of attacking the pitcher.
Perhaps someone else sees this differently?
_________________
formerly ROF
Second, Tracy seems to have no conception of what pitchers are trying to do to him. He most often takes first pitch fastballs, often right down the middle, and then finds himself behind in the count. Then he begins swinging at pitches out of the strike zone and since most often those are away pitches, he cannot get any kind of power swing on them at all, given his body movement. So he's somewhat stuck with flailing at away pitches instead of being able to hit them with force.
Finally, he's become a real sucker for sharply breaking pitches low and inside, again (IMO) in an attempt to provide power. He just can't seem to even recognize them for what they are anymore and he certainly can't lay off them, especially when behind in the count.
I agree with your assessment of Tracy. I'd take this point even further, though: He can't see pitches, period. He looks like a total guess hitter most of the time, which can work for some, but not for Tracy. If he doesn't get exactly what he's expecting, he has no hope. When he gets what he's expecting, it's not like he executes terribly well, either. Pitchers have been able to consistently get him out on pitches ANYWHERE this season.
Quote:
Tracy needs to decide what kind of hitter he wants to be and then adjust his plate approach to accomodate it. If he wants to be a pull hitter, he ought to adopt the Darrell Porter stance close to the plate and dare the pitcher to throw it inside. That way he might at least cover the outside part of the plate better. If he wants to be more of a contact hitter, he needs to step into the ball instead of trying to twist away from it and still make solid contact.
IMO, Tracy needs a lot of close personal instruction and hitting/swinging repetitions in the off season to correct these faults, plus some serious teaching in recognition of the strike zone and in a method of attacking the pitcher.
This is why I'm very open to trading Tracy this offseason if the right offer is there. I haven't seen anything from him that indicates he is able to be productive, in the field or at the plate, for more than a handful of weeks before he gets completely out of whack. Tracy doesn't seem to have much focus.
I really want to know how much in-season work he's put in - were the coaches trying to help correct his flaws, or have they left Tracy alone? Was Tracy willing to listen to advice, or did he just let everything slide?
Watching the Cardinals feed last night, they were promoting an upcoming TV special on Albert Pujols. Al Hrobosky mentioned how Albert is always willing to help other players with hitting--the Cardinals have him do a spring training workshop with younger players.
BUT this is not just limited to helping others within the organization--that a number of other players have sent video tape of their at bats to Albert for him to examine and offer suggestions. He apparently is very happy to do what he can to help other players when he can.
Not that I can imagine Chad or most Dbacks ever asking for coaching hints from Albert, but it certainly couldn't hurt.
So, anyone ever think the Dbacks should've taken Alex Gordon instead of Justin Upton?
I love Upton's potential, but some days, I wonder...
_________________
Old school Hollywood baseball,
Joe Girardi is ten feet tall,
Old school Hollywood baseball,
Me and Frenchy walk a ton.
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1555
Location: clawing my eyes out, praying for sleep. booyah.
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:57 pm Post subject:
i'd have gone for upton too. i mean, he was the universal concensus. but yeah, i've been watching gordon hit like a man possessed and having second thoughts...
_________________
Hank, you're dead to me.
Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 665
Location: worm factory
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 7:27 pm Post subject:
I could go on a long diatribe about this, but to keep simple, Chad got homer and pull happy, and his head now comes off the ball, to go along with a million other problems. I think I know who screwed him up. MY moneys on him getting it back, though, due to his great hand eye, and his nice flat short stroke. NOw his defense, on the other hand.
_________________
My wife is always trying to get rid of me. The other day she told me to put the garbage out. I said to her I already did. She told me to go and keep an eye on it
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1748
Location: Researching my theory that a lime hat is more effective than tinfoil
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:10 am Post subject:
We will have to wait till next year to see how Upton progresses. Maybe Gordon will end up being the superior pick but I don't think we can criticize the decision at all. Everyone *knew* he was the best pick. It wasn't even close. Sometimes things just don't work out. Maybe he will dominate Lancaster.
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1748
Location: Researching my theory that a lime hat is more effective than tinfoil
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:17 am Post subject:
Robert S. wrote:
Wasn't Gordon in the Texas League this year?
Wow, he was. It may be a hitter's league but damn that's impressive that he can start there and kick ass like that.
The thing with Gordon/Upton is that it really isn't a fair comparison. Gordon is 22 and played 3 years on college against pitchers much better than the guys Upton faced in HS. In fairness, we should wait until Upton is 21 before we say Gordon was the better pick. Instead, we should compare Upton to other HS kids that went directly to low A ball. Don't most HS kids start out in rookie ball (Missoula, Yakima)? It's not like he sucked in South Bend either, he just didn't stand out.
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 279
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:41 am Post subject:
matt wrote:
It's not like he sucked in South Bend either, he just didn't stand out.
Which might be a good thing, if he has that sense of "entitlement" we keep hearing about. Maybe being just average in A-ball will get him motivated again.
All times are GMT - 7 Hours Goto page Previous1, 2
Page 2 of 2
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum