View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stu
Everyday Player
Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 560
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:55 am Post subject: Melvin |
|
|
I just got the 2007 Baseball Handbook. I got it mainly because an article said that JB keeps a dog eared copy with him. It is almost the identical to the old yearly Stats, Inc. books.
I don't like format, but it has minor league and Japan numbers for some players. It does have rh/lh splits, park factors, some baserunning and fileding stats and some other features. The purpose of this post is to focus on some stats they gave for managers.
One stat they had is releivers used on consecutive days (RCD). That is if a pitcher is used two days in a row, there is a count on one. Melvin was next to the bottom of this with 86. Low was Giradi at 76. High was Baker with 165 followed by Garner at 157 and Tracy at 156. The numbers then were (and I may miss one or two here) 144, 137, 126, 121 119, 111, 107, 106, 98, 95.
It is too bad they don't have 3 days in a row, dry humping, or some other measure for overuse, but at very least Melvin wasn't bad in this stat last year. In fairness to us critcis we did acknowledge during the season that he improved in this area, but still managed to make poor choices.
Also in fairness to us, Melvin had 123 RCD's in 2005. They don't have the stats for that year but this would have placed him in the top half for 2006.
Melvin also "platooned" more than any other NL manager, 72% of his lineups had the platoon advantage at the start of the game. This is a bogus stat because a switch hitter also gets the platoon advanatge and Melvin had lots of them. I think the failure to platoon Green and Byrnes remains a very justifiable criticism.
Melvin was a 68% in 2005, but he had Tony Clark and Cruz that year plus a number of lh starters like Counsel, Tracy, Gonzo will give you an automatic platoon againt rh's (about 70-75% on its own IIRC). So I am of the view this is dispite Melvin rather than becasue of him. His numbers at Seattle 62 and 59 are more in the average range.
So two of my biggest gripes against Melvin are not borne out by the "stats", but I think we need to look beyond stats in these case. I am willing to concede, as we noted during the season, that Melvin was better on giving his relievers a day off after working them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
qudjy1
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1121
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cool... If you dont mind me asking, how much was it? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Espo
MLB Rookie
Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 173
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Which handbook did you get? Was it the BP one? I would recommend, and I'm sure most of you get this already, the Baseball America prospect handbook. I beat the heck out of my copy last year while down in Tucson and it's a very interesting read. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stu
Everyday Player
Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 560
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
21.95
It is the Bill James Baseball Handbook. Sorry I meant to have that in there. It does not have prospects except as they might be included in the normal player section.
The old Stats, Inc books used to have MLE's but, to me, these proved almost laughable fallible and I guess they dropped them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shoewizard
Hall of Famer
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3235
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Our complaints in 2007 are probably going to be that he leaves the starters in too long, and that he never rests Eric Byrnes.....every time Davanon or Hairston get in the lineup, it will be Young or Quentin that takes a seat. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tmar
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1182
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm hating him already. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Projekt
AAA Stud
Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 72
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I honestly would like to see Melvin play all 4 (or five, if Hariston gets on the ML roster) of the OF players about the same time... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nm132
A-Ball Kid
Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 15
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Projekt wrote: |
I honestly would like to see Melvin play all 4 (or five, if Hariston gets on the ML roster) of the OF players about the same time... |
It's a given that at least one OF is going to struggle in 2007. Eric Byrnes hit .226 in '05 in 400+ AB. DaVanon hit .231 in '05. Both of those guys could easily have similar seasons in 2007. Young players struggle so there's no guarantee that Young and Quentin will be solid for the entire season. There's plenty of room for Hairston to succeed in this OF. I wouldn't mind seeing 120 starts each for Hairston, Young, Quentin, and Byrnes.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
shoewizard
Hall of Famer
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3235
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I wouldn't mind seeing 120 starts each for Hairston, Young, Quentin, and Byrnes. |
So Zero starts for Davanon?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
csktech
MLB Rookie
Joined: 25 Jan 2007
Posts: 104
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Projekt wrote: |
I honestly would like to see Melvin play all 4 (or five, if Hariston gets on the ML roster) of the OF players about the same time... |
Some random thought. I confess that I have never been all that excited about Scott Hariston. After the diasterous year of the first incatation of the Baby Backs where he hit .248 and 88 s/o in 388 AB's I was convinced that he wouldn't make it. Even after last years call up I firmly believed that they only called him up to showcase him for a trade.
after reading the board, and the fact that a lot of you feel he is the real deal, Im cautioulsy optimistic. However, I would hate to see Young's and CQ's at bats sacrificed to get Scott into the game.
I honestly hope that the Backs find a way to trade Eric so Scott and Jeff can split the LF duties. Wouldnt hurt to get some bullpen help in that trade either... Ok So call me Captain Obvious.
Kyle
Go Dbacks
_________________
Ware the Dragon, for thou art crunchy and good with ketchup
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tmar
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1182
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
He was also on line that year to hit 21HR had he been given 550 at bats. That in his first MLB season with all of the other crap that was going on in that nasty year both with him and the team.
In the same number of AB's he's probably the best HR hitter on the D-Backs. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EvilJuan
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1859
Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
csktech wrote: |
However, I would hate to see Young's and CQ's at bats sacrificed to get Scott into the game. |
A thought that many here share, I'm sure.
However, unless something (or someone: hey, JB, hint, hint...) somewhere has changed Melvin's mind, I'm afraid any AB's that come Hairston's way will, indeed, be stolen from CY and CQ -- and not from EB and JD.
Oh, how I hope I'm wrong...
_________________
Is It Next Season Yet?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
B. O. N. D.
Everyday Player
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 854
Location: Tucson, AZ until 3/6... then back to San Francisco
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Eric Byrnes is still in limbo arbitration/contract-wise, right?
It's also interesting to me that Hairston's name is popping up far more frequently as of late in DBacks articles.
Davanon's not going to be ready for the start of the season is he?
Spring training is still a few weeks away. There's still time. To do what, I don't know. Josh Byrnes has yet to prove to me that he's a dumbass.
I really doubt the organization is going to take away valuable ABs from the likes of Q and Young. An EB/SH platoon is more likely (while Davanon heals) then a trade of EB, with Davanon as the 4th OFer.
Of course, I have no idea of what Hairston's splits are, so I'm talking out of my ass until I do some research.
_________________
Oops in the 2 hole! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shoewizard
Hall of Famer
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3235
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Keep in mind in his major league at bats, Hairston has a pretty big Lefty/Righty split., 634 vs RHP, 899 vs LHP
However, like many of the d backs right handed hitters in AAA last year, he had a pretty big reverse split. Must have been a strength of competition issue.
Code: |
Name OPS vs LHP OPS vs RHP
Hairston 874 1073
Quentin 822 946
Young 736 960
Barden 598 935
Team 728 858 |
I know it is said that in the low minors guys have not seen many lefties, so some righties don't have good numbers against lefties early in the pro careers. But by the time they reach AAA they should have seen plenty of lefty pitchers. So there must have been alot of pretty good lefty's in the PCL last year. And especially Hairston, who has been around a while now, and raked against LHP in the majors...(small sample size be damned)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TSWINDERS
Journeyman
Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 426
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There wasn't much in the righty department. In fact I can't even remember a righty period that had any success against us.
_________________
"I think we won 97 games while promoting guys like Chris Young, Carlos Quentin, Stephen Drew, Miguel Montero. When those guys go out there and help the big league team win, it feels great. For us."
Last edited by TSWINDERS on Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:02 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shoewizard
Hall of Famer
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3235
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, the hitting numbers say otherwise, as the OPS vs. Lefties is far lower than OPS vs. righties. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stu
Everyday Player
Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 560
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Sidewinders had 1431 ab's against lhp last year for the 266/340/389 that shoe notes. Against rhp, they were 299/374/484 in 3628 ab's.
http://www.minorleaguesplits.com/tm/TucPCL/b06.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
B. O. N. D.
Everyday Player
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 854
Location: Tucson, AZ until 3/6... then back to San Francisco
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, there you go: Hairston gets 400+/- ABs vs. RHP and Byrnes gets 150 ABs vs. LHP.
Done.
Ok, I'm being a little facetious. Still. Byrnes being able to give days rest to the whole OF until Davanon is ready, plus platoon with Hairston, almost justifies his salary. No way Byrnes would be happy in that role, of course.
_________________
Oops in the 2 hole! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dangerfield
Everyday Player
Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 665
Location: worm factory
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sorry guys, As of this posting, I have Byrnes leading off, playing 145 games next year. We're gonna have to find another spot for Hairston. My line-up trumps, hairston playing time. sorry.
I'd go into more, about how good Byrnes season was last year, but I'm waiting for arb to be over.
You know, I'm already starting to wonder how underestimated Stephen Drew is going to be next year. You know, you look at his lhp splits last year, and rh power splits, my percodin projections might just be a little off on the high end. don't be surprised if he has 25 or more homers next year. And there's reasons why for my projections. Drew for the two or third hole.
_________________
My wife is always trying to get rid of me. The other day she told me to put the garbage out. I said to her I already did. She told me to go and keep an eye on it |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TSWINDERS
Journeyman
Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 426
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shoewizard wrote: |
Well, the hitting numbers say otherwise, as the OPS vs. Lefties is far lower than OPS vs. righties. |
Oops that should have been righties, I will go back and edit that
_________________
"I think we won 97 games while promoting guys like Chris Young, Carlos Quentin, Stephen Drew, Miguel Montero. When those guys go out there and help the big league team win, it feels great. For us."
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
shoewizard
Hall of Famer
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3235
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
my percodin projections might just be a little off on the high end |
LOL...yeah, we've noticed that.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dre
AA Prospect
Joined: 05 Jan 2007
Posts: 47
Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
At this point, if we can't trade Byrnes... let's just give DaVanon his outright release and eat that $1.25M. That way we keep Hairston on as our 4th OF. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tmar
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1182
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Best case is Davanon is out for about 2 mos <necessary or not> in the beginning of the season and Hairston gets some starts and just announces his presence with authority.
If Hairston gets Byrnes days off and every day that Byrnes gives Young/Q a day off Hairston gets to play <along with PH responsibilities> Hairston might have the opportunity to earn a permanent position. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TAP
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 2396
Location: Gold Canyon
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
B. O. N. D. wrote: |
Eric Byrnes is still in limbo arbitration/contract-wise, right? |
scout.com today wrote: |
OF Eric Byrnes and the Diamondbacks were $750,000 apart in arbitration negotiations. Byrnes was seeking $5 million. "There's a lot of information that goes into arbitration, things we point to, things the other side points to," general manager Josh Byrnes said. "Sometimes, a compromise is made easily. Sometimes, it isn't." |
link
Baseball arbitration involves no compromise; It's either $5M or it's $4.25M. Josh Byrnes must be referring to pre-arbitration negotiations (or he was simply misquoted).
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
AZ SnakePit
MLB Rookie
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 189
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
|
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
TAP wrote: |
Baseball arbitration involves no compromise; It's either $5M or it's $4.25M. Josh Byrnes must be referring to pre-arbitration negotiations (or he was simply misquoted). |
But I believe the D'backs and Byrnes could still negotiate a compromise independently, right up until they present their case? I'd presume that was what was meant here.
_________________
Jim McLennan
AZ SnakePit
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|