View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
B. O. N. D.
Everyday Player

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 859
Location: Tucson, AZ until 3/6... then back to San Francisco
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:42 pm Post subject: Help Me With BABIP |
 |
|
I've read the definition. I understand the formula, at least the mechanics of it. I'm having a hard time conceptualizing it's importance or what it really MEANS about a player.
I've seen BABIP brought-up in several discussions, in different contexts... most recently about Drew. Someone mentioned his BABIP was extremely high, and in most contexts I've seen a high BABIP treated as suspicious and not sustainable.
Uh? I need help. 
_________________
Oops in the 2 hole! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1763
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 1:50 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
everything you wanted to know about babip
http://www.babip.org/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1763
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 1:55 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
ok, a discussion here
http://www.fangraphs.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11
babip is far more commonly used when talking about pitchers |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
McCray
Veteran Presence

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1555
Location: clawing my eyes out, praying for sleep. booyah.
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 1:57 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
my understanding is that babip, whether for a hitter or a pitcher, is mostly dependent on chance. that is, for most everyone, it's right around 300 (i think). so, when drew hit 380 or whatever for his babip last year, he was freakishly lucky. that is, all he had to do was make contact and it had a great chance of being a hit. a better chance than normal, at least.
so, logically, drew won't continue to have a 380 babip next season, since it's luck-based. he had a lucky 06. that doesn't make his 07 any better though. and since most people stay around 300, it's a good bet to think he'll drop towards that.
same for pitchers. if you see a pitcher with a babip over 300, he's been unlucky, or he's played in front of bad defense. next year, he'll likely be better. a pitcher with a 100 babip is having a lucky year. he'll get worse.
any help?
_________________
Hank, you're dead to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
B. O. N. D.
Everyday Player

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 859
Location: Tucson, AZ until 3/6... then back to San Francisco
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 3:36 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Good one, Levski... 
From the discussion Levski's link points to:
Quote: |
I'm honestly not as familiar with batters BABIP as I am with pitchers, but good batters seem to be able to keep their BABIP at higher than average levels. See the sampling of the career BABIP list below:
Derek Jeter: .359
Bobby Abreu: .356
Ichiro Suzuki: .355
Todd Helton: .343
Manny Ramirez: .342 |
That was going to be one of my points to McCray's post (thanks McCray! It made sense.)... that with a good hitter who can put the ball into play where he wants it, into gaps, etc. it's more than luck. I think luck has more to do with the pitching BABIP.
Obviously, looking at the above hitters, Drew's .380 is a monster and is going to drop, but anywhere from .340-.360 is still the best in the league.
Levski said he could see Drew having a Hanley Ramirez 2006 type of year. His BABIP was .346.
_________________
Oops in the 2 hole!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
McCray
Veteran Presence

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1555
Location: clawing my eyes out, praying for sleep. booyah.
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:45 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
jeter and ichiro's babip seem to me to be more speed dependent -- that is, i see those two guys legging out a lot of infield hits that would artificially inflate their babip. i'm not too familiar with abreu or helton, but i'm fairly sure manny's not one of the faster guys in the game, so that one puzzles me.
_________________
Hank, you're dead to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shoewizard
Hall of Famer

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3243
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 6:07 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Drew was .396, not .380 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
B. O. N. D.
Everyday Player

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 859
Location: Tucson, AZ until 3/6... then back to San Francisco
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 6:58 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
shoewizard wrote: |
Drew was .396, not .380 |
Jeez louise... it's gonna drop, yeah.
I wonder how much of that (besides Drew being a great hitter) is OF being unfamiliar with him... not knowing where to play him?
_________________
Oops in the 2 hole!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
McCray
Veteran Presence

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1555
Location: clawing my eyes out, praying for sleep. booyah.
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:03 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
a 396 babip is gonna drop, yeah. but this kid is pretty fast down to first. i'd say there's a decent chance he stays somewhere above avg. just... not this far above.
_________________
Hank, you're dead to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|