View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
shoewizard
Hall of Famer
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3142
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wait a minute...you just told me I overate park factors
I really don't think park factors are beltre's problem. He is just too hacktastic...plain and simple.
108 OPS+ last year, 106 for his career....last year 47 walks, 118k's and a .328 OBP
He's gonna be 28 on opening day..this shit aint ever gonna change with any consistency. But I guess he probably does have another great season in him over the next 3 years, maybe.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1725
|
Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
shoewizard wrote: |
Wait a minute...you just told me I overate park factors
|
i just threw it out there to get a rise out of you
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1725
|
Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
anyhow, shoewiz, weren't you telling me recently you wanted to trade tracy for pennies and sign pedro feliz to be your third baseman of the future?
i'd much rather have beltre over feliz, that's for sure. i'd rather have the entire city of cancun fielding 3b for the dbacks than feliz, actually... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dangerfield
Everyday Player
Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 661
Location: worm factory
|
Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's the plan....We trade, Vizcaino and Barden for DMac.
Now, back to trading Chad T to Bucs for Gorz.
_________________
My wife is always trying to get rid of me. The other day she told me to put the garbage out. I said to her I already did. She told me to go and keep an eye on it |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tmar
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1161
|
Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok so I'm bored on a Saturday so I figured I'd look deeper into the comparison of Beltre vs Tracy.
First, in Tracy's defense:
1-In 2006 he had a better GIDBP at 2.2% vs Beltre's 2.9%
2-Over the last 3 years his SO/BB averages 1.98 vs Beltre's 2.68 <over last 2 years, I left his "outlier year out the analysis">
3-Tracy's OBP and OPS numbers are considerably better than Beltre (.350 vs .315 on OBP and .820 vs .755 OPS, again using averages for Tracy's last 3yrs and Beltre's last 2yrs)
Now, in Beltre's defens:
1-The park factors are totally diverse.
a- AZ was #1 in HR WA was #18
b- AZ was #3 in Hits WA was #30 <dead last>
c- AZ was #4 in Runs WA was #29
2-At bats per home run- Tracy averaged 36 AB per HR whereas Beltre averaged 28 AB per HR. <remembering park factors this is also a bit significant>
3-Beltre's defense much better than Tracy's
a- FPCT .968 vs .935
b- RF 3.04 vs 2.78
c- ZR .799 vs .774
4-Not that it is too significant but for 2006 Beltre had a Win Share of 19 vs Tracy's 14 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kris
September Call-Up
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 75
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The Pirates have two primary pieces on their wish list, a left-handed power hitter they hope to acquire through a trade and a reliable right-handed arm to complement Ian Snell in the rotation and offset the three lefthanders, Zach Duke, Paul Maholm and Tom Gorzelanny. The Pirates are among a dozen teams pursuing free agent Jeff Suppan.
-- Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
|
Looks like Tracy fits that description very well.
I think we should go for it. Its easy to find hitting replacement compared to pitching.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
shoewizard
Hall of Famer
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3142
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's not easy to replace Tracy at this moment in time.
Barden is a good defender, but doesn't project to hit in the majors
Callaspo does not really have the power you want from a corner position. It's not like we have Ryan Howard over at first base to make up for it.
There are no other viable 3rd base candidates in the system, and no viable free agent options to replace him either.
There are only two conditions under which this would work:
If the D backs were able to trade for a viable 3rd base alternative, such as Ensberg, then it would be possible, but that isn't likely now as the trade chit we have, Eric Byrnes, isn't needed in Houston now that they have signed Lee.
Finally, if the D Backs DO trade with Pittsburgh, I think it better be for Gorzelanny, and not Duke or Maholm. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kris
September Call-Up
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 75
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Finally, if the D Backs DO trade with Pittsburgh, I think it better be for Gorzelanny, and not Duke or Maholm.
|
Agreed...
Quote: |
There are no other viable 3rd base candidates in the system, and no viable free agent options to replace him either.
|
Uggla was able to shine in Majors after playing AFL.
Reynolds did well in AFL series. Lets give him chance and keep Barden on bench or Trade him.
Sometimes all they need is chance to prove, just like Uggla.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
qudjy1
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1101
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Uggla is probably a one in a thousand example. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shoewizard
Hall of Famer
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3142
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Reynolds does not appear ready defensively to take over at 3rd base.
I do agree with others that Reynolds should be given the 3rd base job in Tucson and grab a position for his own to sink or swim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TSWINDERS
Journeyman
Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 389
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
qudjy1 wrote: |
Uggla is probably a one in a thousand example. |
I have close to 15 games worth of data on Uggla from 2005 never did i see him sticking on a 25 man roster the whole season much less put up the number he did. I noted his power but also have in my notes that he was old for the SL last year (25).
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TSWINDERS
Journeyman
Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 389
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shoewizard wrote: |
Reynolds does not appear ready defensively to take over at 3rd base.
I do agree with others that Reynolds should be given the 3rd base job in Tucson and grab a position for his own to sink or swim |
Yes this is exactly how I feel. I would like to see how he handles 3rd base and AAA pitching. I would not be to concerned over early errors becuase of the playing field at TEP.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zephon
MLB Rookie
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 128
Location: Tucson, Arizona
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It would be stupid to trade Tracy this offseason, unless we're blown away by an offer. Do I really need to go over all the reasons?
FACTS:
1.) His trading value is probably at it's lowest.
2.) We have no prospects that could replace his offense. Callaspo can hit for average, and can definately handle the postion defensively, but he doesn't have enough power. Reynolds might be the real deal, but I don't think he'll be ready till midseason, at the earliest. Barden shouldn't even be in the discussion.
3.) We're not even sure who the real Chad Tracy is at this point. Is it the 2005 version? or the 2006 version? or somewhere in between?
If it's the 2005 version, we should keep him, it's simple. If it's the 2006 version, then yeah, maybe we should trade him. I think trading Tracy is definately a wait and see deal
_________________
-Zephon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1725
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If we could get Jose Bautista and some pitching (someone like Maholm or even Damaso Marte) for Tracy, I'd pull the trigger on that trade... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zephon
MLB Rookie
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 128
Location: Tucson, Arizona
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's about what I'd ask for Tracy. I'd want a at least one GOOD Pitching prospect, or two solid ones, along with a decent third base prospect.
_________________
-Zephon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1725
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Zephon wrote: |
That's about what I'd ask for Tracy. I'd want a at least one GOOD Pitching prospect, or two solid ones, along with a decent third base prospect. |
Well, Bautista would be the jewel of that trade, not the pitcher...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zephon
MLB Rookie
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 128
Location: Tucson, Arizona
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i'll admit that I don't know anything about jose bautista. Care to provide some linkage Lev?
_________________
-Zephon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1725
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bautista lost a lot of developmental time when he got taken in the rule 5, but he's got potential. And pretty good power...
http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/B/Jose-Bautista-2.shtml
I wouldn't trade Tracy for Bautista straight up, for sure, but if you get a pitcher like Maholm as well, I'd do it |
|
Back to top |
|
|
qudjy1
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1101
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
All i know about Bautista is that he has only been in the league for 2-3 years, and he has been on like 4 teams - mostly due to rule 5 i think.
I think he came up as a 3B, but can play just about anywhere.
Quick bat, and not a great fielder... but has raw ability... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zephon
MLB Rookie
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 128
Location: Tucson, Arizona
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nothing really strikes me about his stats in paticular. Bautista+Maholm Or Gorz+another prospect.... I'd jump at... but I think we could get more for tracy midseason or during the next offseason, especially if Tracy rebounds.
_________________
-Zephon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1725
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Zephon wrote: |
Nothing really strikes me about his stats in paticular. Bautista+Maholm Or Gorz+another prospect.... I'd jump at... but I think we could get more for tracy midseason or during the next offseason, especially if Tracy rebounds. |
Well, this is why you could get Bautista as a throw in along with someone like Maholm this year.
Next year, there's a very good chance that you couldn't trade Tracy for Bautista straight up.
Tracy, for all of my internet love for him, is probably going to be a trade bait to play 1b on a team with a low payroll looking for a left handed bat...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tmar
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1161
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If we traded Tracy & Byrnes we could afford to take on about 8MM of Beltre's salary, pending on what Seattle would want in return. Being a "ground ball" pitching club <or hopefully so> we could use some defense at 3B.
I also think his power numbers would greatly increase batting in the BOB. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|