Diamondbacks Bullpen Forum Index Diamondbacks Bullpen
The baseball forum that doesn't suck
 
 Home       News Feed 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Is this true?? HOPE NOT

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Diamondbacks Bullpen Forum Index -> Team News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
NJ-DBACKS-FAN
Journeyman


Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 388
Location: exit 8a

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 9:52 am    Post subject: Is this true?? HOPE NOT Reply with quote

Living here in NJ i hear crap about the Yankees and Mets all day.....
Now that they Yanks are having "some of thier own" playing well they talk about the yanks farm system not being bad.....

which leads me to my point, is it true when the d-backs and yanks were pulling off the Johnson and Vaz deal the yanks had Robinson Cano in the deal and the dbacks said no dont want him?? Well turns out he is a player and he would be a nice one to have/trade later....

Dont know if this is true, or if anyone knows, but I had to ask and I figured that this is the best place....


any insight?
_________________
Not many D-Back fans in NJ.....


Like to think im a trend setter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stuart
MLB Rookie


Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 173
Location: Middlesbrough, UK

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They said anyone from the minors could be included, meaning we also took a flyer on Chin Min Chicken Wings or whoever he is.

Hed be a pretty sweet guy to have in the rotation now Crying or Very sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
matt
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1748
Location: Researching my theory that a lime hat is more effective than tinfoil

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's right. Hell, we probably could have had both!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DesertKnight
Journeyman


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 279
Location: Phoenix, AZ

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

But if I remember correctly, and I might be wrong, didn't we pick Navarro because that's who the Dodgers wanted in the Green swap? So our choice was based on what we needed to get Green, not on our own farm system.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
YBC-Dog
MLB Rookie


Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 128
Location: The PHX

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DesertKnight wrote:
But if I remember correctly, and I might be wrong, didn't we pick Navarro because that's who the Dodgers wanted in the Green swap? So our choice was based on what we needed to get Green, not on our own farm system.


God, that statement makes me bang my head against a wall. Could you imagine a Wang/Webb rotation?

Instead we got Shawn Green...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
levski
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1763

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DesertKnight wrote:
But if I remember correctly, and I might be wrong, didn't we pick Navarro because that's who the Dodgers wanted in the Green swap? So our choice was based on what we needed to get Green, not on our own farm system.


that is correct. the dbacks could've had any two yankee prospects, but if the better the prospects, the less cash the dbacks were going to get along with Javy. so, yes, the dbacks could've had wang and cano...

but moorad was so busy imagining himself having manly sex with a real mensch like green in rf to actually think about the quality of the players az would be getting back. granted, wang's sort of came out of nowhere...
_________________
Old school Hollywood baseball,
Joe Girardi is ten feet tall,
Old school Hollywood baseball,
Me and Frenchy walk a ton.

And Tony Pena cuts in line...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NJ-DBACKS-FAN
Journeyman


Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 388
Location: exit 8a

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok so i will continue with my

"i have no idea, i am not on the front office email list" answers when they ask


cause navarro for green??? then they trade him to TB???? man the green trade looks worse each and everyday
_________________
Not many D-Back fans in NJ.....


Like to think im a trend setter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aaron
MLB Rookie


Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 117
Location: Los Angeles, CA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not sold on either being a better bet going forward than Chris Young. I'm ok with how that all turned out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NJ-DBACKS-FAN
Journeyman


Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 388
Location: exit 8a

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aaron wrote:
I'm not sold on either being a better bet going forward than Chris Young. I'm ok with how that all turned out.



chris young is an after thought, his deal has nothing to do with what we could have gotten from the yanks

what about young, cano, and wang......


pretty good
_________________
Not many D-Back fans in NJ.....


Like to think im a trend setter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
matt
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1748
Location: Researching my theory that a lime hat is more effective than tinfoil

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wang or no Wang, we still get Young back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
baldmaga
Journeyman


Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 491
Location: Louisiana

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't forget we got Brad Halsey too...

We all know how that worked out

At least we have a serviceable arm in the bullpen now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Aaron
MLB Rookie


Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 117
Location: Los Angeles, CA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NJ-DBACKS-FAN wrote:

chris young is an after thought, his deal has nothing to do with what we could have gotten from the yanks


Not true. Chris Young came because of Vazquez. If we'd taken the prospects instead of Vazquez there'd be no Chris Young.

Really, the indirect haul from RJ doesn't look all that bad:

Chris Young (via Vazquez)
Juan Cruz (via Halsey)
Jose Vizcaino (Vazquez)
Jorge Julio (Vazquez/El Duque)

One of the best CF prospects in the game, 3 above average bullpen arms (although sometimes erratic), one with some upside as a starter. Admittedly, I'm ignoring money factors. But if we ignore the Shawn Green component of these deals (which we can by just ignoring Dioner Navarro) then there aren't really money factors to consider.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DesertKnight
Journeyman


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 279
Location: Phoenix, AZ

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let's not forget that RJ wanted out, he wanted to go to NYY, and we couldn't afford to pay him what it would have taken to keep him. I think, given those restrictions, the team didn't do too badly.

I would like to know--if any of you have access to such info--what the scouting reports were on Cano and Wang at the time of the trade. Were they considered good prospects or not? I seem to recall that Cano wasn't really thought that highly of--after all, the Yanks signed Womack so they wouldn't have to play Cano.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NJ-DBACKS-FAN
Journeyman


Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 388
Location: exit 8a

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aaron wrote:
NJ-DBACKS-FAN wrote:

chris young is an after thought, his deal has nothing to do with what we could have gotten from the yanks


Not true. Chris Young came because of Vazquez. If we'd taken the prospects instead of Vazquez there'd be no Chris Young.

Really, the indirect haul from RJ doesn't look all that bad:

Chris Young (via Vazquez)
Juan Cruz (via Halsey)
Jose Vizcaino (Vazquez)
Jorge Julio (Vazquez/El Duque)

One of the best CF prospects in the game, 3 above average bullpen arms (although sometimes erratic), one with some upside as a starter. Admittedly, I'm ignoring money factors. But if we ignore the Shawn Green component of these deals (which we can by just ignoring Dioner Navarro) then there aren't really money factors to consider.




no your wrong....

the deal was vaz AND what prospects we could have picked from.......so we could have gotten cano along with vaz.....then ship vaz to white sox for young
_________________
Not many D-Back fans in NJ.....


Like to think im a trend setter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NJ-DBACKS-FAN
Journeyman


Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 388
Location: exit 8a

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DesertKnight wrote:


I would like to know--if any of you have access to such info--what the scouting reports were on Cano and Wang at the time of the trade. Were they considered good prospects or not? I seem to recall that Cano wasn't really thought that highly of--after all, the Yanks signed Womack so they wouldn't have to play Cano.




this is why i started this and asked....does anyone have this information?
_________________
Not many D-Back fans in NJ.....


Like to think im a trend setter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beer connoiseur
AA Prospect


Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 46
Location: Sucha-Place-a, Mesa

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe Cano was indeed held in high regard within the Yankee's system. Whether or not the Dbacks could have gotten him is debatable seeing as Moorad's goal at the time was to secure Shawn Green from the Dodgers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aaron
MLB Rookie


Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 117
Location: Los Angeles, CA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NJ-DBACKS-FAN wrote:
no your wrong....


Maybe. I guess I was thinking of the original offers heading up to the 2004 trade deadline. I remember reading reports that the Yankees were offering the Diamondbacks their choice of any 4 prospects in the system (something like that). The D-backs were holding out for Vazquez which killed the deal. (Again, reportedly and from my memories. I've got zero insider info).

As for the actual deal that happened, I'm sure that if they'd insisted on Cano rather than Navarro they Yankees would have gladly obliged. So you're right, we could have had Cano and Young. I'm not losing any sleep over it though. I still don't generally think that highly of Cano.

Cano never had a great scouting report, just a generally decent one. Most reports I used to read always had him as a journeyman guy, slightly above average with the bat but not a plus defender. Probably never sniffing an All-Star game. During those years the Yankee system was always lambasted as very poor with Navarro and Eric Duncan generally considered their best prospects. Cano never made it onto any of Baseball America's Top 100 lists. Navarro was #41 in 2004, Duncan #36 in 2005.

I remember discussing Yankee prospects at length on the old board. Everyone was well aware of Cano but nobody was pushing hard to acquire him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Catharsis
Journeyman


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 338

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The D-Backs could sure use a lot of Wang.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TAP
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 2404
Location: Gold Canyon

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Catharsis wrote:
The D-Backs could sure use a lot of Wang.

...since they lost their big unit.
_________________
That's the true harbinger of spring, not crocuses or swallows returning to Capistrano, but the sound of a bat on a ball.
~Bill Veeck
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DesertKnight
Journeyman


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 279
Location: Phoenix, AZ

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 2:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Catharsis wrote:
The D-Backs could sure use a lot of Wang.


Okay, one more silly remark then I'll get serious. When Wang was first put into the Yanks rotation, the CNNSI headline read, "Yankees Insert Wang into Rotation." This led to an interesting email exchange with a Yankee-supporting friend of mine. I specifically remember comments like, "Is Rotation another stripper like Mystique and Aura?", "Yanks now have a Big Unit and a Small Wang," and some remark I don't remember clearly involving the Chrysler Building...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stu
Everyday Player


Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 560

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 2:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wang was #10 on BA's ranking. Cano #2. Navarro #5. I remember liking Duncan at the time, but I think the poster who said the Dbacks looked only at Navvaro because that is who the Dodgers wanted is right.

The Yanks (add that to your sexual inuendo list) were not thought to have a great farm system at the time.

From November 2004


CHIEN-MING WANG, rhp Age: 25 B-T: R-R Ht: 6-3. Wt: 200
Signed: Taiwan, 2000 Signed by: John Cox/Gordon Blakeley


Background: Wang signed for $1.9 million out of Taiwan in 2000, and he's close to paying dividends after being deterred by shoulder surgery in 2001 and a shoulder strain in 2003. He shined for Taiwan in the 2004 Olympics, going 1-0, 1.98 in two starts.

Strengths: Wang has one of the best fastballs in the organization. His fastball velocity returned to its pre-injury level late in 2004, as he worked at 92-95 mph and touched 97. He proved he's healthy by logging a career-high 149 innings. His splitter and slider are solid-average pitches.

Weaknesses: While Wang's fastball has excellent velocity, it tends to get straight. He needs to use his changeup and splitter better against lefthanders, who tattooed him for a .307 average in 2004. Wang’s medical history isn’t encouraging, and he pulled a hamstring in the Triple-A International League playoffs, knocking him out of the organization’s fall minicamp.

The Future: Wang will get a chance to break into the big league rotation in 2005. He’s the Yankees' best option for a low-cost, young starter.


2004 Club (Class) W L ERA G GS CG SV IP H HR BB SO AVG
Trenton (AA) 6 5 4.05 18 18 0 0 109 112 6 26 90 .266
Columbus (AAA) 5 1 2.01 6 5 2 0 40 31 3 8 35 .215


2. ROBINSON CANO, 2b Age: 22 B-T: L-R Ht: 6-0 Wt.: 170
Signed: Dominican Republic, 2001 Signed by: Carlos Rios


Background: Many fans became acquainted with Cano when his name was tossed around in trade rumors as the Yankees unsuccessfully tried to acquire Randy Johnson at the July 31 deadline. A confident player, Cano plays as if he belongs in the majors. His father Jose pitched briefly in the big leagues.

Strengths: Cano’s arm is his best tool and rates as a 65 on the 20-80 scouting scale. More important, he can hit. He has good bat speed and a fluid swing, allowing him to catch up to good fastballs. His improving plate discipline helped his power numbers increase, as he set career highs in walks and slugging percentage in 2004.

Weaknesses: Cano hasn’t handled lefthanders well, with just seven extra-base hits in 130 at-bats against southpaws above Class A. He's a below-average runner for an infielder, and his lower half figures to get thicker as he gets older. However, he has solid infield actions and the Yankees refute reports that he has below-average range.

The Future: If Miguel Cairo leaves via free agency, Cano could be a platoon option in New York for 2005. More likely, he'll head back to Columbus for a full season in Triple-A.


2004 Club (Class) AVG OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB
Trenton (AA) .301 .356 .497 292 43 88 20 8 7 44 24 40 2
Columbus (AAA) .259 .316 .403 216 22 56 9 2 6 30 18 27 0

DIONER NAVARRO, c Age: 21 B-T: B-R Ht: 5-10 Wt: 190
Signed: Venezuela, 2000 Signed by: Ricardo Finol/Carlos Rios


Background: Like Robinson Cano, Navarro was widely discussed in trade talks in 2004. He entered the year as the organization's top prospect but struggled early, then recovered to earn promotions to Triple-A and New York. He singled off Toronto's David Bush for his first big league hit.

Strengths: Navarro has a compact swing that helps him make consistent hard contact from both sides of the plate. He's a gap-to-gap, line-drive hitter and isn't afraid to take a walk or work deep counts. A converted infielder, he has a strong throwing arm that helped him nab 33 percent of basestealers in 2004. His receiving skills are average.

Weaknesses: Navarro showed up at Double-A Trenton overconfident after his 58-game trial there in 2003, and his play suffered. An attempt to get stronger in the offseason backfired, as he came in overweight and lost some bat speed. He never has hit for much power, and his lack of conditioning made matters worse.

The Future: A strong finish helped Navarro salvage an otherwise uninspiring season, but he's clearly not ready for New York yet. He'll need at least another year and must re-establish himself as the heir to Jorge Posada.


2004 Club (Class) AVG OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB
Trenton (AA) .271 .354 .369 255 32 69 14 1 3 29 33 44 1
Columbus (AAA) .250 .316 .360 136 18 34 8 2 1 16 14 17 1
New York (AL) .429 .429 .429 7 2 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Eric Duncan, 3b
2. Robinson Cano, 2b
3. Philip Hughes, rhp
4. Steven White, rhp
5. Dioner Navarro, c
6. Christian Garcia, rhp
7. Marcos Vechionacci, inf
8. Melky Cabrera, of
9. Bronson Sardinha, 3b/of
10. Chien-Ming Wang, rhp


Last edited by stu on Thu Sep 28, 2006 2:40 pm; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
B. O. N. D.
Everyday Player


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 859
Location: Tucson, AZ until 3/6... then back to San Francisco

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 2:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmmm... Yankees, A-Rod, the Big Unit (aka Randy Johnson), Wang... I think I'm getting the picture. Laughing

And Jeter rhymes with peter.
_________________
Oops in the 2 hole!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Diamondbacks Bullpen Forum Index -> Team News All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



visitors since April 13, 2006.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group