Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3242
Location: In front of my computer
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:48 pm Post subject: If I were Baseball Dictator For life
Things I’d Change if I were Baseball Dictator for life:
League Alignment & Schedule:
1.) I’d contract the Devil Rays and the Marlins, and put their players in a draft to be taken by the other 28 teams. I would prohibit any major league franchise from ever moving to Florida ever again. It’s all going be underwater in 20 years anyway.
2.) Two Leagues, 14 teams each, no divisions.
3.) No inter league play
4.) Teams play balanced schedule, 12 games against each team in their league, 156 Game season
5.) Top 4 teams in each league make the playoffs.
Playoffs & World Series
1.) Of course 1 vs. 4, 2 vs. 3
2.) Best of 7 in first round. Teams 1 & 2 get FIVE home games in first round. (2-2-3)
3.) Best of 7 in second round, highest seeded team gets home field advantage 4-3
4.) Home field advantage alternates for the World Series.
Rules:
1.) No DH in either league
2.) Widen home plate two inches
3.) Increase minimum bat handle thickness.
4.) Maximum 3 pitching changes per team for 9 inning game. (so max 4 pitchers may be used) Exception: if the 4th pitcher in a game gives up 4 runs or more, the manager may have a 4th pitching change and use a 5th pitcher.
Extra inning games, each subsequent pitcher used must pitch a minimum of one inning.
5.) The Claudio Vargas/ Steve Trachsel Rule: Maximum 30 seconds to deliver the next pitch from the time the catcher throws the ball back to the mound. Batter may not step out of the box more than once per at bat, except in cases where he fouls a ball off his foot or leg.
Penalty for violating is a ball charged to the pitcher, a strike charged to the batter.
Revenue Sharing:
I would adopt Bill James plan. All television and merchandise revenues would be split as follows:
Teams keep 50% for themselves, and 50% goes into the league fund, and that league fund is then divided evenly among the 28 teams. Obviously teams that have their own cable networks would have to be audited so that a fair market rate was being paid to the team.
Teams keep 100% of all other revenues for themselves.
There would be a salary cap and a salary floor. The amount of that cap and floor would be adjusted according to overall revenues.
All Star Game:
The All star game would be played April 1st or 2nd, immediately at the end of spring training. (Simply do away with the extra exhibition games played after teams break camp from spring training) The advantages to this:
1.) It would be a great way to welcome fans back to baseball
2.) Fan voting would be based on the entire previous season’s results, making it more likely that deserving candidates that happened to do better in the second half would receive votes.
3.) Since Starters are not asked pitch more than 2-3 innings anyway, there would not be any issues with guys begging out of pitching in the all star game because their arms are worn out mid season. Position players would not be banged up yet either, so the top guys voted into the game would actually be more likely to show up.
4.) It won’t be too hot to finally have an All Star game in Arizona.
5.) Teams could still be given a 3 day break in the schedule to rest and be with family immediately following the 4th of July. (baseball should always be played on the 4th of July)
Fine Print: AS BASEBALL DICTATOR FOR LIFE, I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO AMEND, DELETE, ADD, EDIT ANY RULE AS I SEE FIT.
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 2404
Location: Gold Canyon
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 12:00 am Post subject: Re: If I were Baseball Dictator For life
shoe, I'm okay with these dictatorial proclamations. However there are two caveats...
shoewizard wrote:
I’d contract the Devil Rays and the Marlins, and put their players in a draft to be taken by the other 28 teams. I would prohibit any major league franchise from ever moving to Florida ever again. It’s all going be underwater in 20 years anyway.
5 California teams will also be underwater as soon as the big one hits and Arizona becomes a coastal state.
shoewizard wrote:
Widen home plate two inches
I'm okay with this only as long as umpires are monitored each game and assurance is given that every umpire strictly adheres to a common strike zone.
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3242
Location: In front of my computer
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm Post subject:
OK, as dictator I am making an ammendment. In order to fuel in state rivalaries, and to add some mystery back into the world series, these will be the league breakdowns:
OK, as dictator I am making an ammendment. In order to fuel in state rivalaries, and to add some mystery back into the world series, these will be the league breakdowns:
LAA, LAD, SD, SFO, OAK, SEA, AZ, COL, TEX, HOU, CHI W, CHI C, CLE, CIN
Milwaukee, Minnesota, Kansas City and St Louis are all west of Cleveland and Cincinnati. I guess a strong aptitude in geography is not a requirement for being a dictator.
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1555
Location: clawing my eyes out, praying for sleep. booyah.
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:29 pm Post subject:
wow, in one day we had our bloody rise to power, and our terrible, hank-fueled fall from grace. and of course, it ended in a nuke. wow. productive day...
_________________
Hank, you're dead to me.
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3242
Location: In front of my computer
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:08 pm Post subject:
David B wrote:
shoewizard wrote:
OK, as dictator I am making an ammendment. In order to fuel in state rivalaries, and to add some mystery back into the world series, these will be the league breakdowns:
LAA, LAD, SD, SFO, OAK, SEA, AZ, COL, TEX, HOU, CHI W, CHI C, CLE, CIN
Milwaukee, Minnesota, Kansas City and St Louis are all west of Cleveland and Cincinnati. I guess a strong aptitude in geography is not a requirement for being a dictator.
Despite YOUR insolence, you make a valid point. You shall live. Switch them with KC and St.Louis. Leave Mil and & Minn in the East.
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3242
Location: In front of my computer
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:09 pm Post subject:
McCray wrote:
wow, in one day we had our bloody rise to power, and our terrible, hank-fueled fall from grace. and of course, it ended in a nuke. wow. productive day...
I wish Josh would hurry up and make a damn trade already!!
OK, as dictator I am making an ammendment. In order to fuel in state rivalaries, and to add some mystery back into the world series, these will be the league breakdowns:
LAA, LAD, SD, SFO, OAK, SEA, AZ, COL, TEX, HOU, CHI W, CHI C, CLE, CIN
perhaps schedules could be created to allow for good weather cities to host games for the 1st week or so to prevent playing in snow.
maybe keep 162 game sched to allow for a few extra games against main rival..no, wait!!!!!! allow for the last 6 games to be played amongst those teams vying for a playoff spot!! wow!! that would be exciting!! like, a 1-day break before the last 6 games to get teams put together, hotel rooms, etc...hmm... a pre-playoff playoff!! (burp)
Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 23
Location: Gilbert AZ
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:20 pm Post subject:
If I could recreate baseball, I'd go for a European soccer style relegation/ promotion system. Such a system would eliminate the free-riding at the bottom of the league b/c they'd risk relegation to a lower league. It would make minor league baseball 1000% more interesting b/c the races & games would matter.
_________________
-Steve
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1871
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:57 am Post subject:
unc84steve wrote:
If I could recreate baseball, I'd go for a European soccer style relegation/ promotion system. Such a system would eliminate the free-riding at the bottom of the league b/c they'd risk relegation to a lower league. It would make minor league baseball 1000% more interesting b/c the races & games would matter.
If I read you correctly, you're saying that Tampa Bay would be demoted (i.e., be dropped as a team at the MLB level); while Tucson would be promoted from the PCL to MLB.
If so, while it's an intriguing thought, there are too many complications along the way; to say nothing of the disparity in facilities from the major league level to the minor league level. What about the problem of being a team whose minor league affiliate is now a potential competitor? What about division realignments? What do you do if you're a team with a multi-million dollar facility, and you get demoted?
Sherman, set the Wayback for 1869, Cooperstown, New York. We have a lot of work to do in order to change... everything...
_________________
Is It Next Season Yet?
Last edited by EvilJuan on Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:03 am; edited 1 time in total
I think the relegation system should only involve existing major league teams. A premiere league of 16 teams and an A league of the other 14 (or 16, if you want to expand to...oh, say, Las Vegas and Portland). The bottom two finishers in the Premeiere league (let's say they're Cincinnati and Houston) would get demoted, and the top two teams in the A league (let's call them Cleveland and Arizona) would be promoted.
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1871
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:51 pm Post subject:
David B wrote:
I think the relegation system should only involve existing major league teams. A premiere league of 16 teams and an A league of the other 14 (or 16, if you want to expand to...oh, say, Las Vegas and Portland). The bottom two finishers in the Premeiere league (let's say they're Cincinnati and Houston) would get demoted, and the top two teams in the A league (let's call them Cleveland and Arizona) would be promoted.
Don't we have this, basically, with the wild card team going to the playoffs?
_________________
Is It Next Season Yet?
No EvilJuan, its not at all like the wild card. Under the present system the Blue Jays and Orioles could spend money wisely to be compettive, and yet still never be able to wrest a wild card birth from the Red Sox or Yankees.
You would have two distinct leagues. The premiere league would probably start out as basically the large market teams (the New Yorks, Boston, LA, Anaheim, etc), and presumably the A League would start with a lot of the smaller market teams. At the end of the season, the two worst teams in the Premeire league get demoted, and the two best teams in the A league get promoted. Ideally, the competive balance in the two leagues would be fairly even, because the groupings would be much closer to payroll. Plus, this year there would have been a pennant race among teams like Florida, Arizona, Cleveland, etc, creating excitement in markets where no excitement existed this year.
At the end of the season, smaller market teams that have a good season get rewarded, and larger market teams that can't compete get demoted.
Thus, you have a situation where a Cleveland, or Florida, or Arizona get to compete against teams with similar payrolls, with a reward of getting promoted if they excell. I don't know if this is a perfect system or not, but it's at least something to ponder.
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1749
Location: Researching my theory that a lime hat is more effective than tinfoil
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 3:38 pm Post subject:
Yeah that's a scary proposition. Fun to talk about but there is no way in hell that could ever happen. People freak out at the slightest changes in the game, no way in hell would the fans allow it (nevermind the small market owners and the player's union).
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum