View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
allstar
AAA Stud

Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 68
Location: Chandler, AZ
|
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:34 pm Post subject: 2007 Diamondbacks Lineup??? |
 |
|
Hi, I'm a newbie here and I would do my best to be one of you!
As my first post, I would like to start out with a question.
C- Miguel Montero
1B- Conor Jackson
2B- Orlando Hudson
SS- Stephen Drew
3B- Chad Tracy
LF- Eric Byrnes
CF- Chris Young
RF- Carlos Quentin
The ones in bold are my question marks. First off, will Montero get a start over Chris Snyder? Will Conor Jackson possibly be dealt to the Detroit Tigers for Jeremy Bonderman? What about Chad Tracy? Is he traded? Eric Byrnes still be manning the left field here at Chase? I've heard about the rumors such as Carlos Lee and Pat Burrell. If we do trade Tracy, do we sign Aramis Ramirez or use Alberto Callaspo or Brian Braden, there? Can we even get Jeremy Bonderman or sign Ted Lilly or Gil Meche?
_________________
Too many girls out there to choose from. Just too many. lol. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
McCray
Veteran Presence

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1555
Location: clawing my eyes out, praying for sleep. booyah.
|
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:49 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
hi allstar. i'm sorta the source of the cojack/bonderman rumor. shoe pointed out bonderman, and i've been a fanboy of his since 2003. i just figured that detroit is weak at 1b and in obp -- it's just speculation, nothing real to that rumor. just my guess of a starting point for a trade.
'sides, i doubt we get him. i want him, but EVERYONE is going to want him. we'd really have to pony up prospects to get the kid.
_________________
Hank, you're dead to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1763
|
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:30 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Someone on primer suggested that the Mets deal Milledge, Pelfrey and F. Martinez for Bonderman.
That's a tough package to beat.
_________________
Old school Hollywood baseball,
Joe Girardi is ten feet tall,
Old school Hollywood baseball,
Me and Frenchy walk a ton.
And Tony Pena cuts in line... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Oden
Everyday Player

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 660
Location: Gilbert, AZ
|
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:54 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Could you see Omar doing that? I think he just might be crazy enough to do it after they lose to the Doggers in the 1st round. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dirtygary
Everyday Player
Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 902
Location: Phoenix
|
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:35 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
C- Chris Snyder
1B- Conor Jackson
2B- Orlando Hudson
SS- Stephen Drew
3B- Chad Tracy
LF- Hairston/Davanon; or a big-time LF'er
CF- Chris Young
RF- Carlos Quentin
I'm still convinced that the FO thinks that while every other team is going after the FA pitchers, they should be looking to trade Byrnes and Estrada for pitching or a major bat in LF. The pitching is a long shot, but a power bat would completely alter the dynamic of our team. Or considering the salary, I'd be in favor of a Hairston/Davanon platoon, saving the $4M Byrnes will be getting.
_________________
The pen is mightier than the sword, if that pen is shot out of a gun |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
golfndog
Draft Pick
Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 9
Location: Green Valley, Arizona
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:02 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
dirtygary wrote: |
I'd be in favor of a Hairston/Davanon platoon, saving the $4M Byrnes will be getting. |
I'm also worried that Byrnes will not have nearly as good a year as
2006. Much like Tony Clark from 05 to 06.. I'd keep my eye on
Hairston, platooning is great. He has some ability to field, so I'd have
him work at first base in the off season, as a backup there. He can
hit, we all know that, so give him two places to bat from. LF and 1B.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
McCray
Veteran Presence

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1555
Location: clawing my eyes out, praying for sleep. booyah.
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:32 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
i guess i'm less worried about byrnes' career year than clark's. byrnes got his boost moving to a hitters park and being protected for part of the season from facing tough rh pitching. he'll regress, i'm sure, but i don't think it'll be very drastic.
clark, otoh, saved up all his talent to spend in one year, evidently. because i saw that guy back when he was on the tigers, and he sucked then.
_________________
Hank, you're dead to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
matt
Veteran Presence

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1748
Location: Researching my theory that a lime hat is more effective than tinfoil
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:59 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
So it's settled, we're going after Manny? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shoewizard
Hall of Famer

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3239
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:47 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
ROFL....Sounds like a plan. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moviegeekjn
Veteran Presence

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1217
Location: Phoenix
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 6:25 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
matt wrote: |
So it's settled, we're going after Manny? |
LOL... a defensive upgrade in LF then, eh? Manny would really excite the G & A fans!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
farmfan
Draft Pick
Joined: 30 Sep 2006
Posts: 7
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:13 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Is anyone else worried that Byrnes's career year really was not very good.
His .313 OBP was lower than Mark Mulder this year. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EvilJuan
Veteran Presence

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1870
Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:01 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
farmfan wrote: |
Is anyone else worried that Byrnes's career year really was not very good? |
Yes. 
_________________
Is It Next Season Yet?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
matt
Veteran Presence

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1748
Location: Researching my theory that a lime hat is more effective than tinfoil
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:11 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Just a little bit! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
McCray
Veteran Presence

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1555
Location: clawing my eyes out, praying for sleep. booyah.
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:33 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
hey farmfan, welcome to the baseball forum that doesn't suck. (we really should get a better slogan...)
i'm not that worried about byrnes having a career year last year. i think it's less an amazing year for him, and more being sat against tough rhp, plus a boost from the park factor.
i'm less worried about his regression than i thought i would be. but i could be wrong. hope i'm not, because if he regresses, he's REALLY going to suck in lf. intead of just sorta sucking.
_________________
Hank, you're dead to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
foulpole
Veteran Presence

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1357
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:36 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
levski wrote: |
...That's a tough package to beat. |
So is allstar's avatar...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
farmfan
Draft Pick
Joined: 30 Sep 2006
Posts: 7
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:51 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
i'm not that worried about byrnes having a career year last year. i think it's less an amazing year for him, and more being sat against tough rhp, plus a boost from the park factor.
Now should we have the discussion about $4 million being too much for a left fielder who can't hit right handed pitching. He is worthless the majority of the time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Oden
Everyday Player

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 660
Location: Gilbert, AZ
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:19 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
My preference is still to trade Byrnes this off-season. I'd give huge odds that his trade value is worth more right now than it will be next July or later. If he stays, I have much less of a problem with him in LF than in CF. He's 31 next year and although he wasn't as bad in the field as I made him out to be, I'll enjoy his mindless hustle in LF as opposed to CF.
Regarding his L/R splits, I would consider them fairly extreme. He just strikes out way to much against righties. If he ever decided to use a different approach from the right side, he'd be worth more to me. You'd think in this day & age of video, training & improved use of stats that players would see what they need to improve on. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dirtygary
Everyday Player
Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 902
Location: Phoenix
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:35 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Is Byrnes a traditionally fast starter? I thought he was, if I recall. Might be worth a gamble on him getting off to a good start, and then he'll look really good to a team that needs a solid outfielder around the ASB. But there's also no reason to be the team that gets stuck shelling out the $ to Byrnes for his career year. He's just not good enough against righties, and I don't see him hitting nearly as many HR's, or improving his pitiful OBP much, next year. Speaking of, he's representing himself well on ESPN with Karl and Tim.
_________________
The pen is mightier than the sword, if that pen is shot out of a gun |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bob A
MLB Rookie
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 229
Location: Tucson
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:43 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Before they announced he would be platooning left field next year I was under the impression Brynes only had been signed as a one-year player. Does anyone know how many years we have left on his contract. Even if we give up on Hairston there are still a couple of other outfielders coming up through the ranks that will be knocking on the major league door in a season or two. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shoewizard
Hall of Famer

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3239
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:53 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
The D Backs control Byrnes for one more year. He is arbitration eligible.
If he is signed to another one year deal, then he will be a free agent after the end of 2007. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
YBC-Dog
MLB Rookie
Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 128
Location: The PHX
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:41 am Post subject: |
 |
|
One thing that kind of concerns me is that BOTH Byrnes and Hudson are coming off career years, so we are putting a lot of faith in them to continue that trend and not regress.
If Hudson ends up looking like Orlando Hudson from the 1st half, and Byrnes continues looking like himself, there will be even more pressure on the kids to produce.
I think they're up to the task, but I also wouldn't mind trading Byrnes for someone who could solidify the lineup a little more. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dirtygary
Everyday Player
Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 902
Location: Phoenix
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:52 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Gotta move BYrnes, Estrada, and maybe Hudson while they're at the high value point for whatever pitchig we can asemble for the '08 season and beyond. It'll be way easier to find replacements for those guys than it'll be to fill in gaps in the rotation or the pen. Hudson is the last of the three I'd move for pitchig though. He makes our pitchers better. The other two don't. And I don't think we should get stuck paying for Byrnes career year that he won't repeat.
_________________
The pen is mightier than the sword, if that pen is shot out of a gun |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shoewizard
Hall of Famer

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3239
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:30 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
dirtygary wrote: |
Gotta move BYrnes, Estrada, and maybe Hudson while they're at the high value point for whatever pitchig we can asemble for the '08 season and beyond. It'll be way easier to find replacements for those guys than it'll be to fill in gaps in the rotation or the pen. Hudson is the last of the three I'd move for pitchig though. He makes our pitchers better. The other two don't. And I don't think we should get stuck paying for Byrnes career year that he won't repeat. |
100% agree with this post. But not even Josh Byrnes has big enough stones to trade BOTH Byrnes and Hudson at this juncture. He won't do it.
Orlando Hudson had a 100 OPS+ this year, by the way. Thats league average. League average is good for a second baseman...but it's not all that impressive.
Robert S. once said rather to the point:
If you are keeping Hudson for his offense, well, his offense isn't that good to keep him just for that reason, and if you are keeping him for his defense, his defense is overated.
I was vocal in criticizing Hudson's defense throughout the first half, and I quieted down in the second half on this issue. He seemed to be fielding better in the second half, or maybe I just thought that way because he was hitting better.....LOL
Among everyday second baseman, he ranked about middle of the pack in fielding percentage, very near the bottom in zone rating, but BP's metrics love him....+20 FRAA
My feeling is his weakness is clearly going to his right, but he goes to his left well, and of course is a popup hound. He had a "down year" with the glove, and could be declining defensively, but he could be a little better next year.
Hitting? Doubtful he can do better than 2006.
Hudson is a guy I am willing to concede the "intangibles" he brings to the team will be needed next year. They have to keep him.
Which of course means JB will surprise us all and trade him....LOL
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
qudjy1
Veteran Presence

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1121
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:40 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Are we going to devalue byrnes just by moving him to LF. Imo, he played a pretty good CF last year, and there isnt exactly a surplus of CFers out there. Another reason why trading byrnes now may work out well...
San Fran?
Boston? byrnes would be good as a pull hitter at that park
LAA?
LA?
Both Chicagos?
Theres a long list of teams that could use a cfer... not as long a list for byrnes as a lfer... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shoewizard
Hall of Famer

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3239
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:47 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Don't forget Minnesota, if Hunter leaves.
(Sorry Oden)
Maybe Texas....Mathews is a FA.
Hey...Texas could reunite Gonzo and Byrnes |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|