View previous topic :: View next topic |
Who wins the bet |
Levski wins |
|
60% |
[ 30 ] |
Shoe wins |
|
40% |
[ 20 ] |
|
Total Votes : 50 |
|
Author |
Message |
shoewizard
Hall of Famer
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3034
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 10:33 am Post subject: Lev and Shoe's RJ Bet/ Over Under |
|
|
OK...for RJ, instead of just putting up a poll that says he had a 5.00 era, choose the over/under, I am making this poll about the bet that Lev and I had.
Shoe and Levski's bet:
If RJ pitches for the D backs and has an ERA under 3.75 over a minimum of 150 innings, I have to make "Levski is my daddy" my signature for the entire offseason after the 2007 season.
If RJ has an ERA over 3.75, OR fails to pitch 150 innings...then he has to use the signature "Shoe is my Daddy" for the next off season.
SO for lev to win, RJ must achieve both marks, sub 3.75 ERA AND 150+ innings....if RJ fails on either count, Shoe wins the bet. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
moviegeekjn
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1156
Location: Phoenix
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 10:48 am Post subject: Re: Lev and Shoe's RJ Bet/ Over Under |
|
|
shoewizard wrote: |
SO for lev to win, RJ must achieve both marks, sub 3.75 ERA AND 150+ innings....if RJ fails on either count, Shoe wins the bet. |
IOW, the odds favor Shoe... so I voted for the "underdog"
B'sides, we ALL win if Levski wins
_________________
Old School Reviews
Hank, keep picking against my teams, please!!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dangerfield
Everyday Player
Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 638
Location: worm factory
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
too be fair, it should 150 and era of 4.5. How about 12-6 4.5 era 140 ip, 1.3 whip...He'll go at least 6, in all his starts.
this team is going to score a lot of runs this year. Especially during the Unit starts, due to him not facing Peavy, Schmidt, or a pitcher geeking up to go head to head against him.
Now at the same time, if the team is rolling he's healthy, sub 3.75 wouldn't be that big a deal.
The biggest risk is the health issue of course, and whether these guys want to be winners. Unit's desire and intensity is still there.
_________________
My wife is always trying to get rid of me. The other day she told me to put the garbage out. I said to her I already did. She told me to go and keep an eye on it |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dirtygary
Everyday Player
Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 871
Location: Phoenix
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lev, you're retarded. You got bullied into that ring because of the ghosts of an old fighter...
I'd personally be shocked if RJ is under a 4.2, and he MIGHT get to 150 IP's, but I seriously doubt that, too.
_________________
The pen is mightier than the sword, if that pen is shot out of a gun |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shoewizard
Hall of Famer
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3034
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rodney....don't be difficult....just vote on the bet as we made it
Seriously though.....4.50 ERA isn't worth all that much at 140-150 innings, although it's worth a good deal once you get up around 200 innings.
Really, the bet was set up this way as a proxy for VORP, because most people are not familiar with VORP, (Value over replacement pitcher)
For example, Webb last year had 68.9 VORP which was third highest in the majors behind Santana and Oswalt.
Miguel Batista with a 4.58 ERA and 206 IP had 25.2 VORP
Claudio Vargas with a 4.83 ERA and 167 IP had 13.4 VORP
Now lets put that in perspective. 85 pitchers threw 150 innings last year.
Webb ranked 3rd, Batista ranked 50th, and Vargas ranked 71st
The "mean" was right about David Bush, in 43rd place with 30.9 VORP
(4.41 ERA in 210 IP)
If the D backs get something like a Brad Radke type season, 162 IP, 4.33 ERA for Minn, that gave Radke 23.3 VORP, which ranked 52nd out of 85 in the majors last year.
I think the D backs need much more than that in return for 4 players and 24 million. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Counsell
MLB Rookie
Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 193
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Heck, it's not a terrible bet for Shoewizard if the only component of the bet was 150 innings. I'd say there's about a 25% chance of Johnson not reaching that.
But the REAL killer for Levski is this: Johnson is going to improved from a 5.00 E.R.A. in a lefty pitcher's paradise to 3.75 E.R.A. in a launching pad at the age of (almost) 44? And the only factor in his favor is that his back surgery will hopefully help him?
Last edited by Counsell on Fri Jan 05, 2007 11:35 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1632
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
dirtygary wrote: |
Lev, you're retarded. You got bullied into that ring because of the ghosts of an old fighter...
I'd personally be shocked if RJ is under a 4.2, and he MIGHT get to 150 IP's, but I seriously doubt that, too. |
Do you seriously think that Josh Byrnes would've traded for a pitcer who wouldn't give AZ at least 150 IP with ERA lower than 4.2?
I know that everybody and their mother fancies himself a stat jockey and a genius at projecting players and performances, but please...
Dirtygary, if you think that you can do better than the projection systems out there (zips, pecota, etc) AND better than Josh Byrnes's staff, then, to put it mildly, YOU are the retard here...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dirtygary
Everyday Player
Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 871
Location: Phoenix
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry for the name-calling. I really meant that I thought the bet was insane. Wouldn't have ever taken it, but since you're defending your position...
I'd like to get in on the action, too.
You want a whole string of "Levski is my daddy"'s all next off-season?
Quote: |
Do you seriously think that Josh Byrnes would've traded for a pitcer who wouldn't give AZ at least 150 IP with ERA lower than 4.2? |
He traded for Livan. And Davis. They might give a little more IP's/Start, but their ERA's won't be much better. And given what SP is going for this off-season, RJ doesn't look like such a bad deal. But you're basically predicting a near Cy Young season, which is a tad optimistic.
_________________
The pen is mightier than the sword, if that pen is shot out of a gun
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
levski
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1632
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dirtygary wrote: |
Sorry for the name-calling. I really meant that I thought the bet was insane. Wouldn't have ever taken it, but since you're defending your position...
I'd like to get in on the action, too.
You want a whole string of "Levski is my daddy"'s all next off-season?
Quote: |
Do you seriously think that Josh Byrnes would've traded for a pitcer who wouldn't give AZ at least 150 IP with ERA lower than 4.2? |
He traded for Livan. And Davis. They might give a little more IP's/Start, but their ERA's won't be much better. And given what SP is going for this off-season, RJ doesn't look like such a bad deal. But you're basically predicting a near Cy Young season, which is a tad optimistic.
|
Let me re-phrase that: do you think he would've gone through this ordeal of acquiring RJ with a pretty decent amount of talent going to NY, if he felt RJ wouldn't give them 150 innings or ERA better than 4.2?
And Livan and Davis are different stories. You cannot base JB's expectations of RJ on davis or livan
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
qudjy1
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1074
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I voted for shoe. BUT. I am more optimistic than shoe is: I still think RJ will end up with about 175-185 innings, but i am thinkning that 3.75 ERA is too optimistic, i think right around 4.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dirtygary
Everyday Player
Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 871
Location: Phoenix
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Names aside, why can't you group the RJ acquisition with the other acquisitions? We gave up talent and assumed payroll. If anything, the Davis and Hernandez acquisitions should be more desired, seeing how they're healthier, younger, and cheaper.
All I'm saying is it's a hell of a gamble on a 43/44 yr old with knee and back problems, a decreasing fastball, and a launching-pad park.
Could wind up being the perfect storm that not even RJ can make it through.
_________________
The pen is mightier than the sword, if that pen is shot out of a gun |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dangerfield
Everyday Player
Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 638
Location: worm factory
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I vote for Levski. Look, my gig, we gave up a lot. Now, that said, Eveland has a huge ceiling and ass. His upside is as high as any prospect out there. Randy is going to be a big part of this organization, EVeland is going to learn from Randy.
_________________
My wife is always trying to get rid of me. The other day she told me to put the garbage out. I said to her I already did. She told me to go and keep an eye on it |
|
Back to top |
|
|
B. O. N. D.
Everyday Player
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 788
Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I voted for Levski because that's a vote for the team.
Plus, he's "always" right.
_________________
Oops in the 2 hole! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
matt
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1653
Location: Researching my theory that a lime hat is more effective than tinfoil
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm with Levski. He averaged 6.2IP/GS in 2006 and 6.6IP/GS in 2005. Keeping that in mind, he will need 22-24 starts to reach 150 IP. I think that is doable. As said before, they wouldn't be getting him if they thought he couldn't have a sub 3.75 ERA. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shoewizard
Hall of Famer
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3034
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
B. O. N. D. wrote: |
I voted for Levski because that's a vote for the team.
Plus, he's "always" right. |
Sure, just ask him!!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
B. O. N. D.
Everyday Player
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 788
Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No sympathy after sneaking in and grabbing that 1000th post on the RJ thread.
Plus, I had "always" in quotes.
_________________
Oops in the 2 hole! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stu
Everyday Player
Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 543
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some place in the 3.75 range to 4.00 range is where I would put the over/under if a condition was that the bet was off if RJ did not pitch 150 innings so I think Shoe got the better of the bet.
Nonetheless, I voted for Lev because who wants to be a bean counter when it comes to baseball. Like the man said, you don't pick your favorite players like you pick your mutual funds. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shoewizard
Hall of Famer
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3034
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are very few bets I would be happier to lose, I think everyone knows that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dirtygary
Everyday Player
Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 871
Location: Phoenix
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We all want Levski to win. That'd be great. It just ain't happening.
_________________
The pen is mightier than the sword, if that pen is shot out of a gun |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dan
September Call-Up
Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 81
Location: Mesa
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Decisions, decisions, decisions.
I want Lev to win because it would better for the Diamondbacks team.
But I think Shoe will win the bet because Unit is an old man with bad knees and a repaired back.
I voted for Shoe because I think it is a more pragmatic view of the 2007 Randy Johnson, although we dream of the 2001 Big Unit.
The bigger question, will the loser of bet follow through? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stu
Everyday Player
Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 543
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The bigger question, will the loser of bet follow through?
Knowing these guys, I'll take the yes on this one every day of the week. No doubt at all. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shoewizard
Hall of Famer
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3034
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The bigger question, will the loser of bet follow through? |
I am sure Levski will...he is a man of his word. And I am friends with the Moderators, so I can ask them to enforce the bet.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
moviegeekjn
Veteran Presence
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1156
Location: Phoenix
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stu wrote: |
The bigger question, will the loser of bet follow through?
Knowing these guys, I'll take the yes on this one every day of the week. No doubt at all. |
Stu is absolutely correct on that matter. Have met both in RL, and their on board ethics matches their RL personas.
_________________
Old School Reviews
Hank, keep picking against my teams, please!!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dylan
MLB Rookie
Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 232
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
moviegeekjn wrote: |
Have met both in RL, and their on board ethics matches their RL personas. |
Is this an endorsement or a disparagement
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
shoewizard
Hall of Famer
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3034
Location: In front of my computer
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LOL....in reality, probably a bit of both. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|