Diamondbacks Bullpen Forum Index Diamondbacks Bullpen
The baseball forum that doesn't suck
 
 Home       News Feed 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
stolen bases next year
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Diamondbacks Bullpen Forum Index -> Team News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dangerfield
Everyday Player


Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 627
Location: worm factory

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:37 am    Post subject: stolen bases next year Reply with quote

Byrnes, Drew, and Young can steal 32, yes 32 sb's each next year, and Cq can steal 20, we will have the highest scoring team in the nl next year. Whitey Herzog will then be interviewed, and explain why running opens up the offense, and why he picks the Diamondbacks to win the West, in August over the Rockies.
_________________
My wife is always trying to get rid of me. The other day she told me to put the garbage out. I said to her I already did. She told me to go and keep an eye on it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NJ-DBACKS-FAN
Journeyman


Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 355
Location: exit 8a

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

that is alot of robbing...


and i would love to see it! i wonder if the manager/coaches would be so inclined to have the green light on so often
_________________
Not many D-Back fans in NJ.....


Like to think im a trend setter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
qudjy1
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1067

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I find it somewhat far-fetched...

But i like it too... i like that style of play - similar to what brenly used to do to maddox... Hudson could be a better base stealer too... he is fast enough IMO...

That being said - not sure that fits our park - im not sure you want to be running into outs in a hitters park...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shoewizard
Hall of Famer


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 3015
Location: In front of my computer

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would be EXTRMELY surprised if Byrnes, Drew and Young even attempted 96 steals in total, let alone had that many successes.

Likewise, I can't see Carlos Quentin even attempting 20 steals. Quentin attempted 27 steals in 346 minor league games.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NJ-DBACKS-FAN
Journeyman


Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 355
Location: exit 8a

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

qudjy1 wrote:
I find it somewhat far-fetched...

But i like it too... i like that style of play - similar to what brenly used to do to maddox... Hudson could be a better base stealer too... he is fast enough IMO...

That being said - not sure that fits our park - im not sure you want to be running into outs in a hitters park...



agree, but with the gaps even my slow ass can score from 2nd!
_________________
Not many D-Back fans in NJ.....


Like to think im a trend setter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
levski
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1616

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nineteen diggity hundred and seventy diggity five steals, baby! count it!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dangerfield
Everyday Player


Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 627
Location: worm factory

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

shoewizard wrote:
I would be EXTRMELY surprised if Byrnes, Drew and Young even attempted 96 steals in total, let alone had that many successes.

Likewise, I can't see Carlos Quentin even attempting 20 steals. Quentin attempted 27 steals in 346 minor league games.



I'm running everybody this year. Cq's going to steal 20, because pitcher's are going to concentrating on getting Tracy out, with breaking balls. Did you forget Tracy's hitting behind, Quentin? Now, I see your point, Conor standing on second, might be blocking CQ too much.
Wink
_________________
My wife is always trying to get rid of me. The other day she told me to put the garbage out. I said to her I already did. She told me to go and keep an eye on it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dirtygary
Everyday Player


Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 871
Location: Phoenix

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

qudjy1 wrote:
That being said - not sure that fits our park - im not sure you want to be running into outs in a hitters park...

I'd agree with you on that, except that's not going to be our style - a bloop and a blast. We need to put the ball in play and get around the bases. I like SB's cuz they're fun, and I think you gotta do it just enough so the other team has to pay attention to it.
_________________
The pen is mightier than the sword, if that pen is shot out of a gun
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dangerfield
Everyday Player


Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 627
Location: worm factory

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I'd agree with you on that, except that's not going to be our style - a bloop and a blast.


The change isn't going to be easy. I expect two factions, on this. Joe Morgan Whitey Herzog, and I. Everyone else. We will run, We will win. Will be this year's chant, and mantra.
_________________
My wife is always trying to get rid of me. The other day she told me to put the garbage out. I said to her I already did. She told me to go and keep an eye on it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
levski
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1616

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dirtygary wrote:
We need to put the ball in play and get around the bases.


As opposed to striking out looking and getting picked off at 1b?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dylan
MLB Rookie


Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 232

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dangerfield, please read and learn. Man, I can't keep teaching you about this game. You're gonna have to pick it up on your own sooner or later. This is exahusting.


http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/printarticle/whitey-ball/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stu
Everyday Player


Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 535

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From my Bill James 2007 handbook, Jackson was doubled off 5 times last year which looks like it lead the league, tied with Weeks. Sizemore and Ichiro! lead the AL with 6.

Byrnes was not thrown at all trying to adance and was not double up. Despite all the comments about Byrnes being reckless on the bases, he was pretty good base runner last year.

I think part of byrnes' success last year was the steal was unexpected and picking his spots. If he runs 40 times, my guess is that he will not have the same success rate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dangerfield
Everyday Player


Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 627
Location: worm factory

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Dangerfield, please read and learn. Man, I can't keep teaching you about this game. You're gonna have to pick it up on your own sooner or later. This is exahusting


Dylan, I get it. I understand the position. I just disagree with it. I talk about what I'm calling the Rudi Law Law. I disagree with a lot of the premises, of What Perry is basing his assumptions on, too.

Of course Obp, plain old fashioned hitting was the prime mover. But my premise is, pitchers start pitching differently, defenses start playing differently, when the sb starts. .

OBP is the prime mover of everything on offense. From there if you get runners in motion, well Whitey ball happens.

There's a lot of great pitchers, who don't make it btw, because rob's drive them batty/or can't hold runners on. Miggy would be a number 1, if he could pitch with robs.
_________________
My wife is always trying to get rid of me. The other day she told me to put the garbage out. I said to her I already did. She told me to go and keep an eye on it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moviegeekjn
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1154
Location: Phoenix

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dangerfield wrote:

The change isn't going to be easy. I expect two factions, on this. Joe Morgan Whitey Herzog, and I. Everyone else. We will run, We will win. Will be this year's chant, and mantra.


Whitey has some good books out there (You're Missin' a Great Game is excellent) that goes into his "philosophy"-- "Whiteyball" was based much more on his team's personnel than any penchant he might've had for running. He actually would have preferred relying on more power, but his Cardinals teams of the 80s weren't designed for it nor was the ballpark at that time.
_________________
Old School Reviews

Hank, keep picking against my teams, please!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Dylan
MLB Rookie


Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 232

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dangerfield wrote:
Quote:
Dangerfield, please read and learn. Man, I can't keep teaching you about this game. You're gonna have to pick it up on your own sooner or later. This is exahusting


There's a lot of great pitchers, who don't make it btw, because rob's drive them batty/or can't hold runners on. Miggy would be a number 1, if he could pitch with robs.


I assume you meant runners on 1B with you say robs, cause that's where the vast majority of SB come from. I know all runners on 1B aren't SB threats, but in his career Miggy has given up a line of .270/.347/.411/.758 with no runners on and a line of .264/.332/.390/.722 with a runner on 1B. Especially note the lower ISO with a runner on 1B. Maybe Miggy didn't face many fastball hitters, right?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dangerfield
Everyday Player


Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 627
Location: worm factory

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

moviegeekjn wrote:
Dangerfield wrote:

The change isn't going to be easy. I expect two factions, on this. Joe Morgan Whitey Herzog, and I. Everyone else. We will run, We will win. Will be this year's chant, and mantra.


Whitey has some good books out there (You're Missin' a Great Game is excellent) that goes into his "philosophy"-- "Whiteyball" was based much more on his team's personnel than any penchant he might've had for running. He actually would have preferred relying on more power, but his Cardinals teams of the 80s weren't designed for it nor was the ballpark at that time.


Like his Royal teams. All those guys ran too.
_________________
My wife is always trying to get rid of me. The other day she told me to put the garbage out. I said to her I already did. She told me to go and keep an eye on it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dangerfield
Everyday Player


Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 627
Location: worm factory

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dylan wrote:
Dangerfield wrote:
Quote:
Dangerfield, please read and learn. Man, I can't keep teaching you about this game. You're gonna have to pick it up on your own sooner or later. This is exahusting


There's a lot of great pitchers, who don't make it btw, because rob's drive them batty/or can't hold runners on. Miggy would be a number 1, if he could pitch with robs.


I assume you meant runners on 1B with you say robs, cause that's where the vast majority of SB come from. I know all runners on 1B aren't SB threats, but in his career Miggy has given up a line of .270/.347/.411/.758 with no runners on and a line of .264/.332/.390/.722 with a runner on 1B. Especially note the lower ISO with a runner on 1B. Maybe Miggy didn't face many fastball hitters, right?


The point is, there are variables to the running game. SB's are an art, its not easy to run on certain pitcher/catchers, but show me a team that runs successfully, smart, and there will be a definite correlation to a good offense, and the way it changes the pitchers rhythms and concentration.

My philosphy would be to run every chance against a good pitcher that doesn't give up runs, if Drew/Byrnes feel they can get to second..

Get'em on, get'em over, get'em in. Now, if you don't have guys who can steal on the team, then yes of course running into outs is dumb, but you're going to tell me, you have Dave Roberts, Rickey Henderson, Coleman, you're not running?
_________________
My wife is always trying to get rid of me. The other day she told me to put the garbage out. I said to her I already did. She told me to go and keep an eye on it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stu
Everyday Player


Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 535

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

On Rudy Law and Carlton Fiske, it looks like they played together for 4 years. Fiske's numbers for those years were

267/336/403
289/355/518
231/289/468
238/320/488

Fiske's lifetime numbers were 269/341/457 so of the 4 years, he was better one year, worse two years and about the same one year than his lifetime record.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dangerfield
Everyday Player


Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 627
Location: worm factory

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like I said, it's me ,Whitey, and Joe Morgan.


http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?n1=fiskca01&year=1983

Year 1983, hit behind Law, who was phenomenal that year at sb. look at Fisk ops with runner on first.
_________________
My wife is always trying to get rid of me. The other day she told me to put the garbage out. I said to her I already did. She told me to go and keep an eye on it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dylan
MLB Rookie


Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 232

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dangerfield wrote:
Like I said, it's me ,Whitey, and Joe Morgan.


http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?n1=fiskca01&year=1983

Year 1983, hit behind Law, who was phenomenal that year at sb. look at Fisk ops with runner on first.


So as long as he put the bat on the ball before Rudi stole the base he was a monster, but the moment Rudi took 2B he turned into a pumpkin (.728 OPS)?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dangerfield
Everyday Player


Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 627
Location: worm factory

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd tell you the answer, but I think you should ask LaRussa, if he'd return your call. Wink
_________________
My wife is always trying to get rid of me. The other day she told me to put the garbage out. I said to her I already did. She told me to go and keep an eye on it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stu
Everyday Player


Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 535

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And the next year Fisk hit 216/293/311. And remember all averages go up with a man on first so having anyone of first is goping to increase a player's numbers.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?n1=fiskca01&year=1984

The numbers also say a disriptive runner casues the averages to go down. But why look at facts when you can cherry pick anecdotes?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
levski
Veteran Presence


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 1616

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 4:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stu wrote:
And the next year Fisk hit 216/293/311. And remember all averages go up with a man on first so having anyone of first is goping to increase a player's numbers.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?n1=fiskca01&year=1984

The numbers also say a disriptive runner casues the averages to go down. But why look at facts when you can cherry pick anecdotes?



why dazzle with brilliance when you can baffle with bullshit?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dangerfield
Everyday Player


Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 627
Location: worm factory

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 4:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stu wrote:
And the next year Fisk hit 216/293/311. And remember all averages go up with a man on first so having anyone of first is goping to increase a player's numbers.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?n1=fiskca01&year=1984

The numbers also say a disriptive runner casues the averages to go down. But why look at facts when you can cherry pick anecdotes?


You do realize, Law stunk in 84.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?n1=lawru01&year=1983
http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?n1=lawru01&year=1984
_________________
My wife is always trying to get rid of me. The other day she told me to put the garbage out. I said to her I already did. She told me to go and keep an eye on it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dangerfield
Everyday Player


Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 627
Location: worm factory

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 4:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?n1=colemvi01&year=1987
http://www.baseball-reference.com/s/smithoz01.shtml

I keep can dazzling with more BS....
_________________
My wife is always trying to get rid of me. The other day she told me to put the garbage out. I said to her I already did. She told me to go and keep an eye on it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Diamondbacks Bullpen Forum Index -> Team News All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



visitors since April 13, 2006.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group